Laserfiche WebLink
Staff contacted the President of the Masonic Lodge, and was informed that the indoor <br />space was used by a group of women engaging in quilting, and the quilters' children <br />were playing outside. The Masonic Lodge building was not rented that day and there <br />were no organized activities. Staff responded to the Millers in writing on November 26, <br />2013 that the activities on November 12 did not constitute an exceedance of the <br />thresholds in the Noise Ordinance because non - amplified human voice noise is not a <br />noise violation. Please see Exhibit I. <br />• On October 1, 2014 — Staff received a letter from Valley Trails Homeowners Association <br />stating support for the Millers' concerns about the activities at the Masonic Lodge <br />(Exhibit J). The Homeowners Association letter includes several attachments, including <br />a request by the Millers for the implementation of additional conditions at the Masonic <br />Lodge. The Millers' request is summarized below: <br />Enforce the existing Conditional Use Permit approval such that all noise would be <br />contained within the existing building and activities would be prohibited in the <br />outdoor space to the north and west of the building. <br />• Replace the existing glass - paneled double /French door with a Sound Transmission <br />Class (STC) rated door to reduce noise spillover. <br />• Require the catering company to procure a Conditional Use Permit, which would <br />include conditions related to the minimization of noise, light spillover onto the <br />residential properties to the north, odors, and other potential nuisances. <br />November 12, 2014 — The Millers requested that the Planning Commission agendize a <br />review of the Conditional Use Permit granted to the Masonic Lodge. After a hearing <br />was scheduled in January 2015, the Millers requested a postponement due to personal <br />reasons. <br />a March 2016 — May 2016 — The Millers filed complaints similar to previous complaints <br />concerning noise and uses at the Masonic Lodge. Staff responded in writing and <br />concluded that no violations had occurred (see Exhibit L). <br />DISCUSSION <br />The approval of UP -77 -13 did not specify the uses allowed on -site, hours of operation, or <br />define the buffer area, or specify the type of buffer and /or any restrictions in the use of the <br />buffer area. In addition, UP -77 -13 did not establish parameters for ancillary uses allowed at <br />the Masonic Lodge. <br />The project site is located within a multi - family residential zoning district. Private <br />noncommercial clubs and lodges, not including hiring halls, are conditionally permitted uses in <br />the multiple - family residential district. A catering company is currently leasing space and <br />operating out of the Masonic Lodge. Although a catering company is not a "noncommercial <br />club," staff notes that the renting of church, synagogue, and noncommercial club space to <br />compatible commercial entities (e.g., daycare facilities, catering companies, and tutoring <br />Lodges) is common in Pleasanton, and the renting entities are typically considered ancillary <br />uses. In this case, because the size of the Masonic Lodge's kitchen is fairly modest and <br />catering activities are limited to standard business hours, staff believes that catering activities <br />UP -77 -13 Modifications, 3370 Hopyard Road Planning Commission <br />Page 9 of 16 <br />