Laserfiche WebLink
Jenny Soo <br />Subject: FW: opposing to the planning of allowing outside activities of the Masons building <br />From: Taeseok Kim <br />Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 7:08 PM <br />To: Adam Weinstein <br />Subject: opposing to the planning of allowing outside activities of the Masons building <br />Dear Planning manager, <br />I am a resident in Valley 'Trails Dr. of Pleasanton. since 201 1 and have been happy in the peaceful environment <br />in this neighborhood. I recently heard the city's planning around the Masons, and can't help writing this letter to <br />strongly protest the idea as below <br />1. I think it is quite absurd to allow a Ibr- prolit business. with a capacity of600, located in a residential area to <br />hold loud outside public parties. including service alcohol. <br />2. I believe the city has an obligation to protect the people who live here from unnecessary and unwarranted <br />noise. so it should refuse the Masons' request to conduct events outside the building. All the noise should stay <br />inside their building where it belongs <br />3. You are ignoring case law precedent in LA with another Masonic lodge in which the court decided that <br />commercial activities in a residential zone do not constitute an allowable use and ordered the Masons to cease <br />and desist commercial activities <br />4. If the Masons avant to hold noisy commercial events. they should move to a commercial zone <br />I hope these help you make a right decision on this matter. <br />I3est Regards. <br />'1'aescok King <br />MI valley trails dr. <br />Pleasanton, CA <br />Click here to report this email as spam. <br />1 <br />