My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 5
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
06 ATTACHMENT 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:07:49 PM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:40:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o Finally, of the three options that staff is providing to you in the 2015 staff report, <br />Option #1 will allow you to continue the current CUP and Design Review. Please <br />note that staff states, <br />"Enforcement of the existing conditions of approval would not allow <br />continued active use of the patio area." <br />Staff is admitting that the current CUP does not allow use of the backyard. Eight <br />years ago when this started, the Planning Department should have told the Masons <br />to stop using the backyard while this was being reviewed with the City. To this day, <br />the Planning Department has still not told the Masons to stop using the backyard, <br />and therefore, the Masons are continuing to use it. <br />The Millers' are confused as to why the City did not include any of the above important <br />information in the January 28, 2015 Staff Report. <br />25. Page 9 of the 2015 Staff Report discusses that despite the City's efforts, no resolution has <br />been reached. <br />"Since the March 2009 Planning Commission meeting, staff has worked with the <br />Masonic Center and the Millers to mitigate concerns raised by the Millers. Staff <br />has met with the Millers several times to address their concerns, discuss the <br />noise ordinance, and discuss the voluntary measures proposed by the Masonic <br />center. However, no resolution has been reached." <br />• It is true that no resolution has been reached. However, the City omitted to state that <br />this is because the City is asking the Millers to allow uses of the Masonic building that <br />are not allowed by the Masons' CUP, the zoning codes or the General Plan and that will <br />destroy their residential home. Would any of the Planning Commissioners or staff be <br />willing to allow an establishment right across their fence line to operate commercial <br />activities with up to 600 people at any time they chose, day or night with alcohol? Of <br />course not, but that is what the Masons are requesting and what the City is asking the <br />Millers to accept. The City should protect the people who live here and enforce the <br />codes. <br />26. Page 9 of the 2015 Staff Report discusses the three options offered to you by staff. <br />• The Millers are asking the Planning Commission to vote for Option #1 and to include the <br />Millers other requests as stated in Section #5 above starting on page 7. <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.