My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 5
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
06 ATTACHMENT 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:07:49 PM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:40:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. The Masons' parties have subsided due to the Millers' efforts—not <br />the City's efforts <br />It is true that the Masons' parties have subsided in the past few years; however, this is because of the <br />Millers' efforts —not the City's. <br />After the 2009 hearing, the Millers lost faith in the City to enforce the codes and so kept the pressure on <br />the Masons through the Millers' own efforts, including: <br />• Complaining directly to the Masons during parties <br />• Creating and publicizing a website ( savepleasantonneighborhoods .com) <br />• Passing flyers out at the 2014 political candidate forums (See Attachments #5 & #6.1 <br />• Telling Kevin Keen, Masonic President, that the Millers had pulled the Masons' tax returns <br />• Contacting the IRS <br />• Contacting the Secretary of State <br />• Contacting the Pleasanton Business License Office <br />• Presenting to the Valley Trails HOA who wrote a letter to the City supporting the Millers <br />• Emailing the Mayor and City Councilmembers <br />• Meeting with Councilmember Kathy Narum <br />• Contacting realtor associations <br />• Bringing these issues before the Planning Commission for a new hearing <br />• Contacting the local newspapers (note: this is still in process). <br />It is the Millers' belief that these efforts paid off in terms of motivating the Masons to be cautious and <br />reduce their parties. Without these efforts, the Millers believe that there would have been many more <br />parties. However. iust this last Monday. there was another party in the backyard. <br />4. If the Masons' parties have subsided, why are the Millers still <br />asking for a hearing? <br />There are several reasons for the Millers bringing this before the planning commissioners even though <br />the parties have subsided. <br />• The Millers believe that their efforts have motivated the Masons to reduce the number of <br />outdoor activities, but without a resolution from the City, the Masons could resume activity at <br />any time. And in fact, there have been two events in August —one event used the backyard area, <br />and the other event did not use the backyard, but the music bled through the glass French doors <br />since the doors are not sound rated. <br />• The leadership of the Masons could change at any time, and the new leadership may wish to <br />pursue increased commercial activity at the site <br />• The Millers need to restore the damage to their property value. An appraiser estimated the <br />damage to the property at 3% to 5%, or possibly even 100% if the Millers could not sell at all due <br />to buyers preferring homes without noise nuisances. At current market values, this is between <br />s <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.