Laserfiche WebLink
Law mike,: ice: of <br />Stuart M. Flashman <br />5626 Occan View Drive <br />Oakland. CA 94618 -1533 <br />(510) 652 -5373 (voice & FAX) <br />c•mail: stu ! +'stul�nsh.com <br />Delivery via email <br />Mr. Mark Dennis, Senior Code <br />Enforcement Officer <br />Mr. Adam Weinstein, Planning Manager/ <br />Deputy Director of Community <br />Development <br />Mr. Gerry Beaudin, Director of <br />Community Development <br />City of Pleasanton <br />P.O. Box 520 <br />Pleasanton, CA 94566 -0802 <br />June 15, 2016 <br />RE: UP- 77 -13, Pleasanton Masonic Center (3370 Hopyard Road)_ <br />Dear Sirs: <br />I am writing on behalf of my clients, Michael and Darlene Miller, regarding the <br />Planning Commission hearing next Wednesday, June 22nd, and the City's <br />unwillingness to enforce the conditions on the Use Permit governing use of the above - <br />referenced parcel. As you know, this parcel is situated in a residentially zoned area, <br />and is directly adjacent to my clients' home. The parcel's location in a residential area <br />is obviously central to understanding the use permit conditions. <br />The lodge apparently conformed to the conditions in the use permit until 2004. <br />Since then, however, there have been systematic violations of those conditions, and of <br />the underlying zoning. <br />My clients have repeatedly asked the City to enforce the use permit and the <br />zoning, to no avail. Most recently, Mr. Mark Dennis, Pleasanton Code Enforcement <br />Officer, wrote to my client, in a letter dated May 13, 2016, that Condition Number 1 of <br />the Lodge's Conditional Use Permit only applied during the construction of the lodge <br />building, and therefore had no effect on current lodge operations. Both my clients and I <br />find this interpretation nothing short of ridiculous. Nowhere in the use permit is there <br />any indication that this condition was for construction activities. Nor has the City ever <br />raised this claim in all the time that my clients have been attempting to have the Use <br />Permit enforced.' The City cannot simply rewrite conditions to avoid their enforcement. <br />1. THE MASONS CANNOT USE THEIR PROPERTY IN WAYS THAT <br />MATERIALLY INJURE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD PROPERTIES OR <br />RESIDENTS. <br />When the Lodge received its Use Permit in 1977, the governing zoning <br />regulations were essentially the same as they now are. Under RM zoning, and <br />specifically Municipal Code Section 18.124.070 (b), the City must make the following <br />finding before granting a conditional use permit: <br />B. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions <br />under which it would be operated or maintained will not be <br />In the staff report for the cancelled January 2015 Planning Commission hearing, the City acknowledged <br />That enforcing this condition "would not allow continued use of the patio area." <br />