My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 5
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
06 ATTACHMENT 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:07:49 PM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:40:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Law mike,: ice: of <br />Stuart M. Flashman <br />5626 Occan View Drive <br />Oakland. CA 94618 -1533 <br />(510) 652 -5373 (voice & FAX) <br />c•mail: stu ! +'stul�nsh.com <br />Delivery via email <br />Mr. Mark Dennis, Senior Code <br />Enforcement Officer <br />Mr. Adam Weinstein, Planning Manager/ <br />Deputy Director of Community <br />Development <br />Mr. Gerry Beaudin, Director of <br />Community Development <br />City of Pleasanton <br />P.O. Box 520 <br />Pleasanton, CA 94566 -0802 <br />June 15, 2016 <br />RE: UP- 77 -13, Pleasanton Masonic Center (3370 Hopyard Road)_ <br />Dear Sirs: <br />I am writing on behalf of my clients, Michael and Darlene Miller, regarding the <br />Planning Commission hearing next Wednesday, June 22nd, and the City's <br />unwillingness to enforce the conditions on the Use Permit governing use of the above - <br />referenced parcel. As you know, this parcel is situated in a residentially zoned area, <br />and is directly adjacent to my clients' home. The parcel's location in a residential area <br />is obviously central to understanding the use permit conditions. <br />The lodge apparently conformed to the conditions in the use permit until 2004. <br />Since then, however, there have been systematic violations of those conditions, and of <br />the underlying zoning. <br />My clients have repeatedly asked the City to enforce the use permit and the <br />zoning, to no avail. Most recently, Mr. Mark Dennis, Pleasanton Code Enforcement <br />Officer, wrote to my client, in a letter dated May 13, 2016, that Condition Number 1 of <br />the Lodge's Conditional Use Permit only applied during the construction of the lodge <br />building, and therefore had no effect on current lodge operations. Both my clients and I <br />find this interpretation nothing short of ridiculous. Nowhere in the use permit is there <br />any indication that this condition was for construction activities. Nor has the City ever <br />raised this claim in all the time that my clients have been attempting to have the Use <br />Permit enforced.' The City cannot simply rewrite conditions to avoid their enforcement. <br />1. THE MASONS CANNOT USE THEIR PROPERTY IN WAYS THAT <br />MATERIALLY INJURE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD PROPERTIES OR <br />RESIDENTS. <br />When the Lodge received its Use Permit in 1977, the governing zoning <br />regulations were essentially the same as they now are. Under RM zoning, and <br />specifically Municipal Code Section 18.124.070 (b), the City must make the following <br />finding before granting a conditional use permit: <br />B. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions <br />under which it would be operated or maintained will not be <br />In the staff report for the cancelled January 2015 Planning Commission hearing, the City acknowledged <br />That enforcing this condition "would not allow continued use of the patio area." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.