My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 5
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
06 ATTACHMENT 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:07:49 PM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:40:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT L <br />offi„, of <br />Stuart M. Flashman <br />5626 Ocean View [Drive <br />Oakland, CA 9461 8 -1 533 <br />(5111) 652 -5373 (voice & FAX) <br />e -mail: stur?swnash.com <br />December 31, 2012 <br />Mr. Jonathan Lowell, City Attorney <br />City of Pleasanton <br />Pleasanton City Hall <br />123 Main Street <br />Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br />RE: Use Permit for Pleasanton Masonic Lodge (3370 Hopyard Road). <br />Dear Mr. Lowell: <br />I am writing on behalf of my clients, Michael and Darlene Miller, to bring to your <br />attention violations of the City of Pleasanton's zoning ordinance and improper and <br />illegal activities taking place under the conditional use permit issued by the City to the <br />Pleasanton Masonic Lodge ( #321). The lodge's site, like my client's home, is zoned <br />residential. Consequently, commercial uses are generally prohibited with limited <br />exceptions. The uses currently occurring on the property containing the Masonic lodge <br />facilities do not fall within these exceptions. The illegal and improperly authorized uses <br />at that site are creating a continuing nuisance for my clients, for which they hold the City <br />at least partly responsible. Their (and my) attempts to address this through the City's <br />planning department and City Manager have been unavailing. I am writing to you in the <br />hopes of getting the situation addressed without having to take legal action against the <br />Masons and the City. <br />As you may be aware, my clients have had a problem with continuing noise <br />disturbances and light pollution emanating from the property where the lodge facilities <br />are located, dating back to 2006. The problems relate primarily to two commercial <br />business activities that began that year: a separately -owned catering business doing <br />business as "A Tasteful Affair" and a commercial banquet and party facility, which is <br />apparently being run by the lodge itself. <br />In June of 2000 and February 2005, the Masons submitted informal requests to <br />the City for "use variances" to conduct catering and banquet hall rental businesses on <br />the site'. Those requests were denied. Later, in November 2005, the Masons <br />submitted another letter repeating those requests. (Copy attached.) This time, the <br />planning department, without anv public notice or hearing, granted the requests. <br />In their letter, the Masons represented that these businesses were just <br />expansions of the existing food preparation for Mason - related functions and building <br />use for Masonic functions. They further represented that the building rentals would <br />amount to one or at most two weekend nights per month, plus one catered luncheon per <br />week. The letter made no mention of using the backyard of the lodge building, which <br />fronts directly on my clients' back yard, as part of the banquet hall rental business. The <br />uses have since expanded far beyond what the Masons requested in 2005. <br />After doing a considerable amount of investigation, my clients have recently <br />discovered that the representations made in the Masons' 2005 letter were neither true <br />nor accurate. As it turns out, the catering business, "A Tasteful Affair," is not the <br />' In 1993, 2000, and 2002, the Masons submitted much more limited requests to allow catering services <br />for internal Masonic events. Those requests were granted. (See below. under accessory use.) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.