My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 5
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
06 ATTACHMENT 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:07:49 PM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:40:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Furthermore, the City made mistakes in granting the Masons' building permit and the use <br />variance for the catering company. <br />Instead of enforcing clearly defined codes, is the City iustifving its mistakes via the accessory <br />use provision? <br />See Attachment IS for a summary of the City's mistakes. <br />6. Current Status <br />In 2014, the Millers indirectly become aware of a letter sent by the Masons to the City. The letter from <br />the Mason's stated: (1) that Masons are not violating the CUP, and (2) that the Masons would rent the <br />backyard area according to a schedule that the Masons proposed. <br />Mr. Fialhos' response to the Masons did not correct the Masons that they were not In compliance with <br />the CUP or the zoning ordinances but rather stated, "I appreciate the Lodge's efforts to be a good <br />neighbor and Pleasanton citizen." <br />Because of the pressure that the Millers are enforcing, the Masons' parties were reduced to several <br />parties. However, the Millers: (1) live in constant fear that the parties may start again, and (2) the <br />Millers must disclose noisy neighbors on realtor forms, which would include the letter from Mr. Fiahlo <br />agreeing that the Masons are in compliance—therefore, the Millers' property value has been damaged <br />by the City. <br />7. Additional Attachments <br />Attachment #6 for details of the Millers requests. <br />Attachment #7 for summary testimony of City officials who disagree with the Planning Staff. <br />Attachment #6 for additional background from 2006 to Present. <br />Attachment #9 for incorrect rebuttals the City has made to the Millers. <br />Attachment #10 for mistakes the Masons made. <br />Attachment #11 for rebuttal letter an acoustical consultant wrote regarding the noise codes <br />(attached to email). <br />Attachment #12 for a letter sent from the Millers' attorney, Stu Fiashman, to City Attorney, Jonathan <br />Lowell, who is not returning Mr. Flashman's phone calls (attached to email). <br />8. In summary. we hope that you will agree to: <br />Page sof18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.