Laserfiche WebLink
Pleasanton that has a pulled back garage they're probably not set back 100 feet. So <br />we're significantly greater than your conventional single family with detached garages <br />that are pulled back. Garages are visible throughout Pleasanton so if we could <br />somehow meet your guest parking ratio and come up with a solution, hopefully you'd be <br />open to that versus taking out Lot 7. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: I think what Nancy was saying is that's an added bonus. We <br />wouldn't take the unit out just because the garage door was showing, but we're looking <br />for 2 parking spaces. <br />Lee: So the decision is for 2 guest spaces. Maybe we could come up with a creative <br />solution. If you had 12 units with 2 additional parking spaces, the parking ratio comes <br />out about 2.17 per unit is the ratio. So if we could somehow meet that 2.17 without <br />taking out a unit, would you guys be willing to do that? <br />Commissioner Allen: They'd be guest spaces, they wouldn't be tied to a unit. They <br />wouldn't be used by anyone within the unit and, let me just test, I don't think we want to <br />do it by going up to 40 feet. <br />Lee: The possible design solution is that instead of the 3 duplexes in the back, maybe it <br />becomes 2 triplexes with a little more separation. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: Or one 6 -plex. It's in the back. <br />Lee: Or one 6 -plex. <br />Commissioner Nagler: It's fair to say were open to it. <br />Beaudin: May I ask the Commission, you were just talking about making two spaces <br />magically appear here. We're gaining the two spaces on the street by closing those curb <br />cuts, or possibly only one depending on how the curb cuts get measured. If push comes <br />to shove and it means a design concession, is one space on street gained and one <br />space in the project sufficient? That street space is not for the project, but they are <br />essentially giving one towards the supply. So I'm just asking. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: It would only take about two minutes to fill up that little space. <br />Beaudin: But it's not there today. It's trying to get the best possible residential <br />development and hoping that 10 years from now cars all park themselves and they'll <br />stack at the end of the cul -de -sac and it's not going to matter. <br />Commissioner Allen: So my comment is the same reason Commissioner O'Connor <br />stated. I'm not supportive of that because other people will likely use the street parking <br />and I think it needs to be dedicated to those units. I'm comparing this to the Spring <br />Street, the final Spring Street project; the Knuppe project that the Council had go back <br />and redo the parking. It's a project like that which is nice and now has the two -car <br />garage and it has 2 spaces behind each garage for guests. Remember in our workshop <br />how we said that? This project is pretty tight because it just has a two -car garage but <br />there is no driveway behind the garage. Had there been a driveway behind the garage, <br />EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 23, 2016 Page 17 of 18 <br />