My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:08:00 PM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:24:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
Document Relationships
07 ATTACHMENT 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Nagler: Just to follow -up on your question, I live on Walnut Drive and the <br />City allowed us to do restricted parking by time but to your point, the residents can get <br />one permit per home. So there is a possibility or variation where you could do <br />something that allows the residents access. <br />Chair Ritter: Great feedback, thanks so much for coming. <br />Behers: Certainly, and I know the parking goes beyond Barone's nights. It's during the <br />fair as well. <br />Chair Ritter: And I do know as this process goes they'll be a lot more outreach from the <br />applicant to the neighborhood so this is the start of the process. <br />Behers: Okay, yeah, this is my first time here. <br />Chair Ritter: Thanks for coming. All right, back to us. Do you guys have any questions <br />for staff or should we go through these bullets? So I was thinking, what I could do is go <br />through each bullet, if you guys say your thoughts and if everybody agrees with the <br />thought, put your hand up or say 'I agree' and if you don't, you don't need to. Adam was <br />asking if we could narrow it down to bullets and what our thoughts are on this so we <br />could come up with recommendations. Does that sound okay? So let's just go to the <br />first one: <br />A. Does the Planning Commission support demolishing the existing home at <br />4372 Pleasanton Avenue and relocating the historic home at 536 St. John Street <br />to the Pleasanton Avenue site? <br />Chair Ritter: Do we want to do a comment? I'll just say I agree. <br />Commissioner Allen: I agree. <br />Commissioner Nagler: I have a quick comment which speaks to the applicant's point. I <br />totally support the idea of moving the historical home, but if that doesn't turn out to be <br />the site, what I would ask is that by the time this project comes back to this Commission <br />for approval, that the site be nailed down so that we can make an actual decision about <br />whether that site's the right place to put the house. <br />Commissioner Allen: I agree. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: I agree. <br />Chair Ritter: I agree. Okay, and discussion point B. <br />B. Is the proposed density for the St. John Street site acceptable? <br />Commissioner Nagler: I personally think that the scale of the building is appropriate to <br />the neighborhood. I think it's terrific that it is two stories. Had it been a three -story <br />proposal it would have been something to think about, so I think the density's fine. But, I <br />do think that this question is a very close cousin to the question about guest parking. <br />EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 23, 2016 Page 9 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.