My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:08:00 PM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:24:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
Document Relationships
07 ATTACHMENT 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
place to go because there's no parking on the street. They may do it just out of need <br />without having to be forced. Don't remove it from the CC &Rs but I don't know that there <br />is much more we can do. <br />Ritter: I have two speaker cards. Alice Mohr? Thank you for coming and staying so <br />late. <br />Alice Mohr: I live on St. Mary's Street in Pleasanton. I came because I'm concerned <br />that my property is right in the back of the back part of that property and I wanted to see <br />what the plans were because I was worried they might be considering three stories. <br />When I saw how many townhouses they wanted to put on the property, I was concerned <br />with three stories, which I think is out of character for that area, and I particularly don't <br />want a three story house behind me, but that's beside the point. <br />The other thing I was going to ask is that if it could be a solid fence, like you know, one <br />of those cement panel type fences that goes across the back of the property. And then I <br />noticed in the plans that I was reading, if I interpret it correctly, it doesn't look like the <br />setback from the back houses there to the back property on what would be the south is <br />the minimum. It looks like it's supposed to be 30 feet and I think it's like 16 -20 feet that <br />they have there and I was just wondering if that's a problem. And then the other thing is <br />that I think the estimate for parking on St. John depends on whether you're going to <br />park there after midnight especially on certain nights like Barone's Thursday Night in the <br />summertime. The parking is really, really terrific around there until the bar closes. Then <br />it lightens up, but it's hard to even put out your trash on St. Mary's Street on those <br />Thursday nights. But, I like the music! <br />The other thing is the Wednesday nights in the summertime; the parking's a little stiffer. <br />But other than special event things, there is some parking on St. John Street. I do a <br />regular dog walk so I keep up. So that was my concern; that the buildings not be too <br />high and because I recognize it's a commercial property and they can put whatever the <br />Planning Commission allows them. I was just going to say what I sort of would like. <br />Thanks very much for listening to me. <br />Chair Ritter: Ok, we have the last speaker card, Linda Behers? <br />Linda Behers: I've lived on St. John Street, across the street, for 19 years, coming up on <br />20 years and I've lived in Pleasanton since 1989 so I understand Pleasanton. The first I <br />heard about the project was when I got the proposed card, so I read the report last <br />Friday when it was posted and I emailed Natalie and followed up with a phone call to <br />make sure she received it. I know in the report tonight you had asked developers to talk <br />with the neighborhood and no one has approached us as far as I'm aware. I'm the <br />president of the St. John Court Board. I am representing my own interests but I've heard <br />my neighbors talk and I know a few of them mentioned that they sent in their emails. So <br />you're already starting to address some of our concerns about the parking. We have <br />responsibility for enforcing our own parking issues. We do have guest parking spots. <br />Even with our guest parking, our two per unit resident parking —we have residents <br />parking on St. John Street on a regular basis, so we know there's people already out <br />there from our 28 homes. My concern is the 12 additional units and what kind of parking <br />would come along with it, because you can't assume just two cars per home. Some <br />EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 23, 2016 Page 7 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.