Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 4 <br /> THE CITY OF Planning Commission <br /> LY'? ' d-+ Staff Report <br /> II <br /> pLEASANTONIc July Item 6.b. <br /> SUBJECT: PUD-118 <br /> APPLICANT/ <br /> PROPERTY OWNER: Mike Carey <br /> PURPOSE: Applications for: 1) certificate of appropriateness to demolish all <br /> existing structures; 2) rezoning of an approximately 13,040-square- <br /> foot site from 0 (Office) to Planned Unit Development — Mixed-Use <br /> (PUD-MU); and 3) PUD Development Plan approval to construct: a) <br /> an approximately 2,229-square-foot, three-story mixed-use building <br /> with office/retail space on the first-floor and three apartments on the <br /> second- and third-floors; and b) three, three-story, detached single- <br /> family homes with potential office space on the first-floors and <br /> related site improvements. <br /> LOCATION: 4791 Augustine Street <br /> GENERAL PLAN: Retail/Highway/Service Commercial; Business and Professional <br /> Offices <br /> SPECIFIC PLAN: Downtown Specific Plan — Office <br /> ZONING: 0 (Office), Downtown Revitalization, and Core Area Overlay District <br /> EXHIBITS: A. Draft Conditions of Approval <br /> B. Proposed Plans dated `Received June 28, 2016" <br /> C. Planning Commission Work Session Meeting Minutes <br /> D. Historic Resource Evaluation dated "Received March 28, <br /> 2016" <br /> E. Location and Notification Map <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> On January 21, 2016, the applicant, Mike Carey, submitted an application to demolish the <br /> existing dwelling and accessory structures on the site and construct one, three-story mixed- <br /> use building with office/retail space on the first-floor and three apartments on the remaining <br /> second and third floors, and three, three-story detached single-family homes on the subject <br /> site. After reviewing an initial application, staff provided the applicant with feedback regarding <br /> the need to evaluate the historical integrity of the existing home and the on-site accessory <br /> structures, the lack of consistency with the Office land use designation given the amount of <br /> residential uses and limited square-footage of the proposed office/retail space, the site layout <br />