13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chair Ritter: ...so if we made it flexible? Commissioner Balch: Therein lies the discussion. Do you want someone to have a bedroom in that room or not is really what you need to answer. Commissioner Nagler: So the issue is Commissioner Allen is pointing out that if it ends up residential, this problem should have required a General Plan Amendment. Commissioner Allen: Maybe you should check with Julie on that, but that's my point. It's less than 10% and it's really a residential project if you don't do much more. Commissioner Balch: But if you kick it to office for example, you kick your parking up possibly another notch. Commissioner Nagler: The question is whether we want to eliminate the flexibility going forward in order to allow this for sure to not be a General Plan Amendment. Commissioner Allen: Should we ask staff their perspective on this? Chair Ritter: What are you hearing us say staff? Weinstein: I don't think you should get hung up on a threshold for the amount of commercial space on this site. It's a PUD and there's not a specification in the Downtown Specific Plan for what the square footage should be. A thorough reading of the Downtown Specific Plan is that the entire ground floor of an office site should be office, right? So we really backed away from that. I want to be really clear about that. This is already a very flexible interpretation of what the DSP calls for, but staffs position has always been that all of the buildings along Old Bernal should have street front commercial space. And we feet pretty strongly about that and that's why we imposed a condition that says that the new space added to Residence 1 should be commercial space. I think Commissioner Allen is exactly right; that it's just not a lot of commercial space overall and I think we are sort of pushing what the office district means and we're really appreciative of the effort that the applicant has made in redesigning that little space, but it doesn't seem too much of an ask to make that commercial and not have it be used as residential because I think if we added the flexibility in this housing market, it's going to be a residential space. It's not going to be a commercial space, so it didn't seem to us to be that much of an ask and the applicant is getting a really good amount of residential space out of this project in this office district. It's not a residential district, so that's our position. Commissioner Nagler: To put it in practical terms, if this space on Residence 1 were required to be commercial space, I guess the owner of the building could rent the space out to somebody else, right? A law firm? Commissioner Balch: A law firm, a one man architect, you know, accountant. Commissioner Nagler: Okay. Commissioner Balch: Can I make a motion? EXCERPT: DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 13, 2016 Page 18 of 21