Laserfiche WebLink
don't have to add extra space. I think that should be left alone too and we're working <br /> with the studios. We don't want to move them. We want to keep them 300 square feet <br /> and we think they're satisfied with one like the other properties would be allowed one. <br /> So that's it. Thank you guys. <br /> Tim Ward, Architect: A couple of things—and I kind of apologize that we made this <br /> vision of adding more space to the Residence 1, and I'm not sure if you have that aerial <br /> view of the revised residence? It was kind of a 3-D thing. Okay, and I think that's a <br /> great improvement. The two fit together really well, and so from that perspective I think <br /> it was really constructive that Natalie kind of bugged us about this and you mentioned it <br /> in your workshop and we appreciate that. In regards to the materials, I think the key <br /> thing that I was trying to do and I think is important is to get a variety of materials there <br /> so we don't get a monolithic sort of block. And whether its asphalt shingles or metal <br /> roof or different colored asphalt, it needs to be broken up, and likewise with the bays <br /> that we use some metal on. I think there are other materials that are optional that <br /> probably do fit into the guidelines so I don't think that's a real problem. <br /> We've always tried to keep this curb cut over here. I told Mike this, if I could go straight <br /> in here, I could get another space there, you know, a conventional—you come in and <br /> have parking on both sides. From the tree, it'd actually line up and the drive would come <br /> in here. And I think it would be very easy to then pick up that seventh space if that was <br /> what the Commission felt was necessary. <br /> Commissioner Nagler: I was thinking of something similar. If we were to allow that tree <br /> to be removed, what kind of tree is it? <br /> Ward: We wouldn't take it out. It's a big one and it really does some screening there <br /> that's really pretty sweet. The arborist said it is really about how we handle the <br /> pavement out in that area and that it's pervious and we don't excavate a lot to do it. It <br /> would be easy to add a space to the right and still get a generous area around that tree. <br /> Chair Ritter: Without removing the tree? <br /> Ward: Yes, without taking it out. And then as far as the setbacks, I mean, we started this <br /> with a PUD in mind where we could establish the setbacks. I know if we have to go to a <br /> 20-foot setback, we became sort of a block building with parking in front. That's kind of <br /> what started to happen in the first studies with Mike, and this corner is way too special <br /> for that. <br /> Commissioner Balch: So the metal is on two parts; the siding and the roof itself. Is there <br /> an alternative siding you would propose that could still cause it to be broken up as you <br /> were saying is needed? <br /> Ward: On the base we might go from the metal siding to some kind of a Craftsmen <br /> shingle, you know, where they do the wide and then the narrow. It's sort of a patterned <br /> shape. It's a little more precise than putting a bunch of shingles on it, but it has a nice <br /> look to it. I think that would fit well. I think we would still stain it so you go into the white <br /> mode so it's not quite so you know, I'm not trying to make it cartoonish.... <br /> EXCERPT: DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 13, 2016 Page 5 of 21 <br />