My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
071916
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:11:32 PM
Creation date
7/13/2016 8:42:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEETING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC <br />17. Public Comment - None <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br />18. Presentation of the Pleasanton Unified School District Demographers Report <br />Micaela Ochoa Substitute Assistant Superintendent, Pleasanton Unified School District, introduced and <br />deferred to Isaac Johnson from Davis Demographics for a report. <br />Mr. Johnson provided details of the report addressing projections, changes in development, basis of <br />projections, description of the data collection process, and trends. <br />Council Member Narum noted that the number of students enrolled is greater than the birth rate and <br />Mr. Johnson stated that there is still a relationship between the two and therefore, they have not seen a <br />need to change the methodology. <br />Council Member Brown commented on the cost of living in the City and children being a little more <br />mature when moving into the City. Mr. Johnson stated that home values have increased and usually, <br />homebuyers in Pleasanton are established, with more buying power and older children. <br />Mr. Johnson addressed the City's future development, how various projections were developed, <br />periods of growth and decline, middle school and high school population projections and the need to <br />monitor specific demographics and developments. <br />Mayor Thome commented on the recent passing of legislation, "By Right Construction" and on <br />Regional Housing Needs Allocations (RHNA) and asked whether RHNA numbers were included in the <br />analysis. <br />Mr. Johnson responded affirmatively and provided examples of where RHNA numbers were taken into <br />account. <br />Mayor Thome noted this is a 10 -year plan and reported that in 2022 there will be a substantial change <br />in RHNA. He suggested the need to think about that in the future. <br />Councilmember Narum asked regarding the occupancy of the St. Anton apartments and Mr. Johnson <br />indicated the building was not occupied when data collection took place. He also addressed the <br />expected number of students in elementary schools. <br />Discussion followed regarding current and projected limits in enrollment and the need for additional <br />facilities in the future. <br />Ms. Ochoa reported that loading schools and classes is a policy decision and that at this point, current <br />facilities are able to accommodate students. She stated that when enrollment is up, they add portable <br />classes but they haven't needed to do that in several years. She added that enrollment projections are <br />done on a yearly basis but that information is available year -by -year as well. <br />It was noted that constituents have claimed that the information in previous demographer reports have <br />been incorrect and Mr. Johnson addressed the margin of error in previous reports. <br />As far as going over maximum enrollment figures, Ms. Ochoa stated that they are not in violation of any <br />education code. <br />City Council Minutes <br />Page3of7 June 7,2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.