Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton Legislative Platform 2016 <br /> • o • <br /> The Honorable Lois Wolk <br /> Senate Bill 1317 <br /> March 14,2016 <br /> Page 2 <br /> government, are also diligently working to establish their GSA by the deadline. Local <br /> agencies have also been working collaboratively with DWR staff in the development of <br /> the regulations for evaluating GSP but understandably want to see the final regulations <br /> in print before developing their GSP. <br /> To that end, RCRC, CSAC and the LCC believe SB 1317 would get ahead of the <br /> GSA/GSP process and would intervene in the local agency decision-making process <br /> which is a key element and foundation of SGMA. Some of the specific concerns with SB <br /> 1317 include that out of the 127 high and medium priority basins only 21 have been <br /> designated as being in critical overdraft and the legislation would impose requirements in <br /> areas that do not have a groundwater problem. Second, for areas that may be <br /> experiencing a groundwater problem, SB 1317 provides a prescriptive solution that may <br /> not be in the local interest or the best approach to address the issue. SGMA was <br /> premised on local control and the"one size fits all"approach as outlined in SB 1317 would <br /> undermine both the premise and spirit of SGMA. <br /> A well permit is currently a relatively simple and low cost process in which a <br /> landowner is attempting to utilize their water rights and with counties fully vested in SGMA <br /> each permit is reviewed through that lens. SB 1317 would create the need for a <br /> conditional use permit(CUP)for wells which can be a lengthy and costly process for local <br /> govemment creating an undue burden which may not even address the issue. <br /> Additionally, SB 1317 as drafted would require cities and counties to use a CUP process <br /> for new well permit applications even in adjudicated basins, which under SGMA are not <br /> required to complete a GSP. <br /> Additionally,local agencies are moving forward independently to address the issue <br /> in a manner that meets their local needs without the mandate of SB 1317 and within <br /> existing authorities. For example, Glenn County adopted an emergency ordinance <br /> creating a six-month moratorium on new well permits when monitoring data revealed early <br /> indications of subsidence suspected of being related to new areas of the county being <br /> brought into irrigated agricultural production. <br /> Finally, the GSAs are to develop their GSPs to provide sustainable groundwater <br /> management which SGMA defines as the management and use of groundwater in a <br /> manner that can be maintained during the planning and implementation horizon without <br /> causing undesirable results. The statutory deadline for the GSP is January 31,2020 and <br /> yet SB 1317 would impose a scheme for preventing an undesirable result that is <br /> premature and may not be germane to any given local area. In fact, in order to support <br /> the use of a CUP, local governments would need to redirect resources (human and <br /> financial) to develop the data necessary to minimize the risk of litigation related to <br /> "takings°; resources that could more effectively used in meeting GSP requirements. <br /> 33IPage <br />