My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
062116
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2016 1:56:58 PM
Creation date
6/15/2016 10:10:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/21/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton Legislative Platform 2016 <br /> 000 <br /> L <br /> LEAGUE" 1400 K Street,Suite 400•Sacramento,California 95814 <br /> Phone:916.658.8200 Fax:916.658.8240 <br /> C [ T [ E S www.cauhes.org <br /> April 5,2016 <br /> The Honorable Richard Bloom <br /> California State Assembly <br /> State Capitol,Room 2003 <br /> Sacramento,CA 95814 <br /> RE: AB 2299(Bloom).Land Use:Housine:lei Units.(as introduced) <br /> Notice of Opposition <br /> Dear Assembly Member Bloom: <br /> The League of California Cities must respectfully oppose your AB 2299,which would require local <br /> agencies to provide by ordinance for the creation of 2nd units in single-family and multifamily residential <br /> zones. This is an unfortunate departure from current law,which gives local governments the authority to <br /> pass such an ordinance when needed and provides directions on how to proceed with applications for such <br /> units when no ordinance exists. <br /> We are in the process of thoroughly reviewing the legislation with cities to fully understand its impacts. <br /> However,there are several areas in which we want to share initial concerns: <br /> Parking requirements.AB 2299 prohibits cities from imposing parking standards if the 2nd unit is <br /> located within one-half mile of public transit or shopping or in an architecturally and historically <br /> significant area. This provision does not take into account any local realities or preferences. Parking <br /> requirements should remain a local issue and reflect community conditions.A state law that attempts to <br /> manage local parking requirements is bound to cause unintended consequences,including increasing <br /> future community opposition to rd units. <br /> Mandate.AB 2299 mandates that cities pass an ordinance. This is a costly requirement for cities,as well <br /> as for the state. Current law,which provides an option for cities to adopt an ordinance when needed,is <br /> sufficient. At this time,we do not believe a mandate is warranted. <br /> Cannot Recuperate Costs. Current law limits the fees that can be charged for an application for a Zed <br /> unit to those incurred due to amendments made to state law in 2001-02. Therefore,cities will not be able <br /> to recoup their costs associated with amendments made to the law this year. <br /> We look forward to talking to you and your staff about these initial concerns. If you have any questions <br /> regarding the League's position on this bill,please do not hesitate to contact me at(916)658-8250. <br /> Sincerely,• �I <br /> Kendra Harris <br /> Legislative Representative <br /> cc: Members and Chair,Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee <br /> Lisa Engel,Chief Consultant,Assembly Housing and Community Development Comm. <br /> William Weber,Consultant,Assembly Republican Caucus <br /> 23 I Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.