03 - Laserfiche WebLink

• Second units (Gov. 65852.2) Must approve second unit with ministerial review. City may not adopt ordinance that totally precludes second units in residential zones unless specific adverse impacts on public health, safety, and welfare. • Ministerial approval of multifamily housing (Gov. 65589.4) Must approve as a permitted use multifamily housing structure located on an infill site that is consistent with general plan and zoning ordinance in which at least 10% of the units are affordable to very low income households; or at least 20% available to lower incomes; or 50% affordable to moderate income households. No project level CEQA review The proposal requires ministerial review of a housing project if it is consistent with "objective general plan and zoning standards." CEQA review that is required for both the general plan and zoning ordinance does not extend to the project level. CEQA review that is required for both the general plan and zoning ordinance may have occurred many years before the development application is submitted. Cities and counties will not be able to determine whether site-specific conditions or changed circumstances and new information require environmental mitigation. If for some reason a previous environmental document was helpful in evaluating the project, the bill does not allow a city to impose conditions to require compliance with previously-adopted mitigation measures. What is an "objective"general plan and zoning standard? The general plan is a policy document. It is the "constitution" of a city or county. It is the document that sets forth the community's vision in the various required elements. Objective standards are included in implementing ordinances and project-level review, not in a general plan. An example of an "objective" zoning standard might be an inclusionary housing requirement. However, if a housing development chooses not to comply with this "objective" standard, the applicant can request a zone change to eliminate the requirement. The proposal requires the city to approve the request as a ministerial decision. Cost of relocation The proposal allows a developer to tear down an existing structure, displace existing residents, and then requires the city or county — that has no discretion in whether or not the structure is torn down or the new housing is built—to pay relocation costs. Affordable housing will not remain affordable A housing development must be "required by law to record" a land-use restriction based on (1) a condition of award of funds or financing from a public agency; (2) as a condition of the award of tax credits; (3) as might be required by contract entered into with a public agency. In other words, if a developer does not receive funding for the affordable housing, the housing will not remain affordable. 4