Laserfiche WebLink
General Plan. Thus, staff concludes that the proposed development plan is consistent with <br /> the City's General Plan and VACSP, and staff believes that this finding can be made. <br /> 3. Whether the plan is compatible with previously developed properties in the vicinity <br /> and the natural, topographic features of the site. <br /> Surrounding properties include single-family residential homes, open space properties, and <br /> the former landfill site for Pleasanton Garbage Service. As conditioned, staff believes that <br /> the proposed residential lots and the design of the homes would be compatible with the <br /> surrounding uses. The proposed building envelopes will minimize the future structures' <br /> impacts on neighboring properties. As conditioned, no second floor addition on Lot 1 would <br /> be allowed and future structures over 10 feet in height on both lots would be subject to the <br /> City's design review process to ensure compatibility with adjacent uses. Therefore, staff <br /> believes that the PUD development plan is compatible with the previously developed <br /> properties and the natural, topographic features of the site, and staff believes that this <br /> finding can be made. <br /> 4. Whether grading takes into account environmental characteristics and is designed in <br /> keeping with the best engineering practices to avoid erosion, slides, or flooding to <br /> have as minimal an effect upon the environment as possible. <br /> Graded areas have been minimized to the extent feasible to preserve the natural <br /> topography of the site and prevent tree removal. In addition, the project retains the <br /> drainage on the site in its existing condition. Erosion control and dust suppression <br /> measures will be documented in the improvement plans and will be administered by the <br /> City's Building and Safety Division. According to the United States Federal Emergency <br /> Management Agency Flood Hazard maps, no portion of the site is located in a flood hazard <br /> zone. Therefore, staff believes that this finding can be made. <br /> 5. Whether streets and buildings have been designed and located to complement the <br /> natural terrain and landscape. <br /> A portion of the existing private road would provide access to the new home sites. A <br /> retaining wall with a maximum five-foot height would be constructed on the east side of the <br /> road. <br /> All existing trees would be retained with the recommended conditions of approval. Existing <br /> trees would provide a natural screen to reduce the visibility of the proposed homes when <br /> viewed from the rear yard of the homes on Gray Fox Court that face the proposed <br /> development. As conditioned, evergreen shrubs would be planted in front of the retaining <br /> walls to further reduce the visibility of the retaining walls from Gray Fox Court. <br /> The proposed homes are two stories in height with articulated wall lines that provide a <br /> break in the massing and promote visual interest. The roof lines are varied to reduce the <br /> massing of the structures and the front façade incorporates stone veneer and stucco. As <br /> Case No. PUD-116, 88 Silver Oaks Court Planning Commission <br /> Page 14 of 16 <br />