Laserfiche WebLink
Given the irregular-shaped lots, staff recommends that the applicant create building envelopes <br /> for each lot rather than identifying minimum setbacks, as it would be difficult to designate the <br /> front, side, and rear yards for each lot. The proposed homes and accessory structures would <br /> need to be located within the defined building envelope area on each lot. <br /> Table 2 shows the distances between the proposed building envelope and property lines. <br /> Table 2: Building Envelope Location and Property Lines <br /> Approximately Distance between Building Envelope and Property Lines <br /> East West South North <br /> Lot 1 30 ft. 33 ft. 125 ft. 580 ft. <br /> Lot 2 33 ft. 35 ft. 170 ft. 1,400 ft. <br /> The intent of setbacks is to provide an adequate buffer between buildings and property lines. <br /> Staff believes the proposed building envelope locations meet this intent and are acceptable. <br /> Additionally, staff finds the proposed building envelope location/area, home size and height are <br /> acceptable as proposed. See specific discussions concerning overall building areas for both <br /> lots and building height for Lot 1 in the following sections of the report. <br /> Access Road. The existing private road extends through the project site. The VACSP <br /> requires private hillside roads comprise a 16-foot-wide paved section with two-foot shoulders <br /> on either side that are maintained free of vegetation. No parking is allowed. The portion of the <br /> existing asphalt road that is within the project area and would provide access to the proposed <br /> two new lots has a minimum paved width of 18 feet. The propose access easement is 20 feet <br /> wide including an additional two feet on the east (upslope) side, thus meeting the VACSP <br /> private road width requirement. <br /> As required, a fire truck pull-out area is proposed on Lot 2 near the pump house. The <br /> applicant will also modify the existing vehicle turn-around area by adding a small paved area to <br /> meet Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department (LPFD) Fire Department turn-around <br /> requirements. Staff believes that the proposed access easement, pull-out area, and fire turn- <br /> around are acceptably designed. <br /> Grading and Retaining Walls. In order to create building pads,fill would be placed on both lots. <br /> The proposed grading utilizes "rounded landform grading" techniques to achieve a natural <br /> transition between graded areas and existing terrain, and prohibits most grading from <br /> occurring within tree driplines to avoid impacts to the existing mature trees. Additionally, the <br /> graded slopes would not be visible from public streets due to intervening hillsides and <br /> vegetation. <br /> The proposed grading is estimated to result an approximately 3,800 cubic yards of cut and <br /> approximately 23,100 cubic yards of fill. The applicant intends to use excess soil from the <br /> Silver Oaks Hillside development (PUD-84), located to the northwest of the project and <br /> currently under construction, to minimize importing soil from elsewhere. <br /> Case No. PUD-116, 88 Silver Oaks Court Planning Commission <br /> Page 8 of 16 <br />