Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Chair Ritter: I'm feeling a little frustrated that it just came out at the end, but part of the <br /> process is to go through that, and as Gerry said earlier, we do make changes at this <br /> stage of the process. I'm more inclined...this is the longest Consent item I've ever <br /> experienced....it sounds like staff and the applicant have some more discussions to do <br /> and I'm not inclined to continue it, I'm actually inclined to approve it with the condition <br /> that they get the Director of Community Development in agreement upon a re-design <br /> and as you heard, we don't want to make it a major re-design. It seems like little bits <br /> would work so we can keep the process going, so that's kind of my thought, to approve <br /> it with a condition, and I don't know if any of you are in support of that? <br /> Commissioner Allen: I would support that. <br /> Commissioner Balch: I'd support it also. <br /> Commissioner Balch moved to approve Case PUD-112, 1027 Rose Avenue, <br /> subject to the Conditions of Approval as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report, <br /> and with the modification of Condition No. 38 as presented to the Commission in <br /> the staff memo dated April 13, 2016. <br /> Commissioner Allen seconded the motion. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> AYES: Commissioners Allen, Balch, Nagler, O'Connor, and Ritter <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> RECUSED: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> Resolution No. PC-2016-08 approving Case PUD-112 was entered and adopted as <br /> motioned. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 13, 2016 Page 10 of 10 <br />