My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
051716
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:25:12 PM
Creation date
5/11/2016 4:28:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/17/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
05
Document Relationships
05 - ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\051716
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Gagliardi: Yes sir. <br /> Commissioner Nagler: And staff is suggesting that the front door be set back, right? <br /> Gagliardi: Currently the front door is set back over seven feet and there is a covered <br /> porch there that is 50 square feet. What they are saying is they want the porch to <br /> extend more over the front of the house laterally. So they are saying the covered porch <br /> as it stands is not sufficient and they would like to see it expanded. So we've talked to <br /> our architects to see if there is a way we could compromise by extending the existing <br /> front porch a few feet out. Staff replied that was insufficient and they would prefer a <br /> more lateral front porch. <br /> Commissioner Balch: Looking at the design, the laundry room is of one of those <br /> windows we see on the left and then next to that looks to be a powder room. So you're <br /> saying that area is not available to extend a porch laterally? <br /> Gagliardi: Not without getting rid of the powder room. <br /> Commissioner Balch: I apologize. Maybe I'm not being clear. If you come out towards <br /> the street five feet and extend to the left, is that a possibility? <br /> Gagliardi: We talked through that with our architect and he is one of the speakers who <br /> can describe that in more detail about why that would not work with the way the roof is <br /> aligned, but we have looked at that option. <br /> Chair Ritter: Staff, can you explain? <br /> Weinstein: Yes, let me clarify. We're absolutely not looking for any sort of change to the <br /> square footage or the configuration of the interior of the house or any changes to the <br /> backyard. We're simply asking for a porch to be extended out from the front of the <br /> house. Mr. Gagliardi is correct—there is an existing entryway that is covered, it <br /> comprises of about 50 square feet. Because of its orientation, it's sort of a long, narrow <br /> corridor; it's substantially less square footage than a compact parking space for <br /> instance. So we're looking for a porch similar to those in the vicinity that extend out to <br /> the front of the house. The development guidelines that are proposed which staff is very <br /> comfortable with, allows for a porch to extend into the front setback without, again, <br /> affecting any of the rest of the house, so no changes to interior space and no changes <br /> to the backyard. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor: So you want the porch to come out from where the front door <br /> is across the living room? <br /> Beaudin: If we look at this area right here, anywhere in this vicinity, we think that a <br /> porch is entirely appropriate and you could even imagine it wrapping slightly around <br /> here. That's typical to the neighborhood. It's south facing and it actually helps with solar <br /> heat gain for the den space. It's an amenity that belongs in the character of this <br /> neighborhood. <br /> Gagliardi: That would completely change the architecture of the front of the house also. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 13, 2016 Page 2 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.