My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
051716
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:25:12 PM
Creation date
5/11/2016 4:28:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/17/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
05
Document Relationships
05 - ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\051716
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
codes, and State of California energy and accessibility requirements. Therefore, staff <br /> believes that this finding can be made. <br /> 7. The proposed development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD District: <br /> The proposed PUD development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD district. <br /> One of these purposes is to allow for creative project design that takes into account site <br /> constraints. Staff believes that through the PUD process the proposed project has <br /> provided the applicant and the City with a development plan that optimizes the use of <br /> this site in a reasonably sensitive manner, with development standards that are similar <br /> to those of the surrounding neighborhood. Therefore, staff believes that this finding can <br /> be made. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> Public notices were sent to all property owners and tenants within a 1,000-foot radius of the <br /> project site. At the time this report was written, staff had not received comments or concerns <br /> from any of the adjacent owners or tenants. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> This project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California <br /> Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects. Section <br /> 15332 exempts from environmental review in-fill developments within City limits, consistent <br /> with General Plan and zoning requirements, occurring on a project site of no more than five <br /> acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. Therefore, no environmental document <br /> accompanies this report. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> Staff believes that the proposed project would be in keeping with the character of homes on <br /> Rose Avenue. The proposed development standards are similar to those of the existing <br /> neighborhood, and are more restrictive than the R-1-10,000 District's street-side side yard <br /> setback, building height measurement and FAR calculation. The proposed design guidelines <br /> would ensure that homes would be compatible with the existing homes in the area. The home <br /> on Lot 4 is attractively designed and takes into account the aesthetic character of the Rose <br /> Avenue corridor. Staff, therefore, believes that the proposed development merits a favorable <br /> recommendation from the Planning Commission. <br /> STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Case PUD-112 by taking the <br /> following actions: <br /> 1. Find that the proposed project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant <br /> to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Section 15332, In-Fill Development <br /> Case No. PUD-112, 1027 Rose Avenue Planning Commission <br /> Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.