My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
051716
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:25:12 PM
Creation date
5/11/2016 4:28:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/17/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
05
Document Relationships
05 - ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\051716
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A noise assessment study was prepared for a recent residential development to the west <br /> (Ponderosa Homes/PUD-99). The report stated that the ambient noise from the activities at <br /> the fairgrounds during the County Fair would, during a worst-case situation, reach 57 dB Ldn, <br /> meeting the General Plan exterior noise requirements. Other ambient noise in the area, <br /> including from vehicles and normal residential activities, would also not cause an exceedance <br /> of the General Plan noise standards. Staff believes that the noise levels taken from this other <br /> study would be similar here as the both sites board the fairgrounds on the north side. Staff has <br /> included a condition requiring disclosure to future homeowners of the activities at the <br /> fairgrounds. <br /> PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS <br /> The Pleasanton Municipal Code sets forth the purposes of the PUD District and the <br /> considerations to be addressed in reviewing a PUD development plan proposal. The Planning <br /> Commission must make the following findings that the proposed PUD development plan <br /> conforms to the purposes of the PUD District, before making its recommendation. <br /> 1. The proposed development plan is in the best interests of the public health, <br /> safety, and general welfare because: <br /> The proposed project, as conditioned, meets all applicable City standards concerning <br /> public health, safety, and welfare. The subject development would include the <br /> installation of all required on-site utilities, with connections to municipal systems. The <br /> project will generate modest traffic volumes that can be accommodated by existing City <br /> streets and intersections in the area. The curb ramps along the project frontage on the <br /> northeast and northwest corners of Rose Avenue and Creek Trail Drive will be required <br /> to be reconstructed to meet current America Disability Act (ADA) standards. The <br /> proposed new driveway would allow for safe entry and exiting from the property. New <br /> landscape proposed as part of the development would enhance the streetscape. The <br /> structures would be designed to meet the requirements of the California Building Code, <br /> California Fire Code, and other applicable City codes. The proposed development is <br /> compatible with the adjacent uses and would be generally consistent with the existing <br /> scale of development and the character of the area. Adequate setbacks would be <br /> provided between the new dwellings and adjacent properties. Therefore, staff believes <br /> that the proposed PUD development plan is in the best interests of the public health, <br /> safety, and general welfare, and that this finding can be made. <br /> 2. The proposed development plan is consistent with the Pleasanton General Plan <br /> and any applicable specific plan because: <br /> The proposed development includes three new residential lots and retention of the <br /> existing residence on an approximately 1.55-acre site. The proposed density of <br /> approximately 2.6 dwelling units per acre conforms to the General Plan Medium Density <br /> Residential land use designation. The proposed project would promote General Plan <br /> Programs and Policies encouraging new housing to be developed in infill and peripheral <br /> areas that are adjacent to existing residential development. Thus, staff concludes that <br /> Case No. PUD-112, 1027 Rose Avenue Planning Commission <br /> Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.