My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
050316
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2017 8:50:02 AM
Creation date
5/2/2016 10:07:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/3/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Honorable Mayor Thorne and Members of the Council <br /> May I, 2016 <br /> Page 2 <br /> annum). The safety of a diverse investment portfolio over time will be approximately <br /> equal to the safety of the U.S. stock market, which has always grown over time. There <br /> will be many costs to the City in administering the historic fund, such as verifying that <br /> each draw has been authorized (by who?), and (hopefully?) managing the growth of the <br /> fund. <br /> Another advantage: An endowment is likely to attract further donations, such that the <br /> corpus of the endowment continues to grow even while funding preservation activities. <br /> It has been my intention to donate half of my executor's fee as the second donation to <br /> the Jean Jones Endowment. <br /> As to directing how the available endowment funds are spent, again I believe the <br /> Historical Society will make better decisions than the City. As a City controlled fund, <br /> even if spent through the Historical Society, real power regarding allocation of those <br /> proceeds will gravitate to the City, as stated in the Staff Report: "The City can dispense <br /> earnings from the estate proceeds and principal from the estate with Council approval, <br /> to the [Historical Society] to support programs . . ." One can envision the Historical <br /> Society in a contractor role, carrying out bequests wrangled by interested parties from <br /> the City. I would not donate half of my Executor's fee to a City controlled "historic fund" <br /> whose allocation would be subject to changing political winds, and I doubt other <br /> potential donors would either. <br /> In a City organization busy spending almost $100 million per year, beset upon by <br /> supplicants for many worthy causes, the historic fund might not get much quality <br /> attention. I would not expect the kind of multi-year systematic program epitomized by <br /> the Historic Recognition Program to take place, or be sustained. Further, having <br /> subject matter expertise is essential to leveraging endowment funds. For example, the <br /> Jean Jones display being planned within the Museum on Main can be grant funded from <br /> the State, but the money must be spent in advance, then the grant is received as a <br /> reimbursement. Putting a City approval process into the middle of that grant funding <br /> process could slow the project down, or forfeit the grant funding opportunity. <br /> The success of civil society requires independent institutions with voice and resources. <br /> The Jean Jones Endowment would give the Historical Society that voice and resources, <br /> and the independence to speak out for Jean Jones' goal of historic preservation. But, <br /> as merely a City sub-contractor, that voice could be silenced. <br /> S' cerely, <br /> (At,004 <br /> Peter MacDonald <br /> Executor, Estate of Jean Jones <br /> Cc: Conservators: Heidi Bailey and Laurie Riddle <br /> Amador Livermore Valley Historical Society <br /> Pleasanton Heritage Association <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.