Laserfiche WebLink
AP -85 Other Actions - 91.420, 91.220(k) <br />Introduction <br />Low income families have difficulty securing housing without income supports and /or housing <br />assistance. Many times they also do not have additional income to pay for other needs such as food, <br />child care, health care and dependable transportation. Living from paycheck to paycheck causes families <br />to be in constant danger of becoming or returning to homelessness. According to the 2010 Census, <br />13.2% (3,243) of Pleasanton's households were low income; 8.7% (2,147) were very low income (50% or <br />below median household income) and 5.7% (1,396) were extremely low income (at or below 30% of <br />median household income). The 2000 Alameda County median family income was $67,600. In 2016, it is <br />$93,600. This is a 38% increase in 16 years. <br />The most commonly available anti - poverty strategies are implemented at the county level and are <br />addressed in the County's section of the Consolidated Plan. The Section 8 certificate and voucher <br />program for Pleasanton residents is currently coordinated through the Housing Authority of the County <br />of Alameda (HACA). The City will consider supporting requests by residents of local senior apartment <br />complexes to receive additional rent subsidies for seniors as opportunities arise. [HACA approved a <br />formal award of 50 Project -based Section 8 Vouchers for the first phase of the Kottinger Gardens senior <br />housing development.] <br />Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs <br />There is significant focus on the provision of affordable housing, supportive social services, and <br />community development programs in Pleasanton among all levels of the public and private sectors. A <br />primary strength of the housing and community development delivery systems is the coordination of <br />efforts between the jurisdictions and the groups that oversee these efforts on an inter - jurisdictional <br />basis. These groups, including the Urban County Technical Advisory Committees, the Alameda County <br />Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee and EveryOne Home, allow the different <br />jurisdictions to ensure that projects compliment rather than duplicate efforts, and that policies and <br />programs have some consistency throughout the Urban County. An additional strength is the growing <br />level of coordination between service providers, particularly those addressing housing needs of the <br />homeless and special needs populations, and affordable housing in collaborations. Non - housing <br />community development programs within the Urban County have involved coordination between the <br />Urban County jurisdictions and the agencies or organizations focused on the particular community <br />development area, which might be infrastructure improvements, economic development, accessibility <br />improvements or child care. <br />Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing <br />The primary gaps facing Pleasanton and its neighbor cities in delivering affordable and supportive <br />Annual Action Plan <br />2016 <br />OMB Control No: 2506 -0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) <br />39 <br />