My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
041216
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 2:28:02 PM
Creation date
4/8/2016 4:34:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/12/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone <br /> Over the past couple of years, this Council has pursued a path supporting developers and the Chamber <br /> of Commerce but one at odds with the desires of the public. The 2500 unit East Side proposal which you <br /> had to drop due to overwhelming public opposition, Lund Ranch II where you violated Measure PP and <br /> are now facing a voter referendum, and now this project. The public has lost faith that the Council will <br /> represent their best interests and have therefore taken a proactive approach of an initiative measure to <br /> stop the big-box component of this project. While it's true that you have the power to approve this <br /> while ignoring the will of the people,the people will hold the ultimate power come November when <br /> many of you will be up for reelection. <br /> Thank you. <br /> Matt Sullivan <br /> From:James Brice <br /> Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 9:31 AM <br /> To: Herb Ritter <br /> Herb, <br /> I would like to express my strong support for the proposed economic zone on Johnson Drive in <br /> Pleasanton. A Costco would add to Pleasanton's tax base. It would reduce the city's carbon imprint by <br /> reducing the length of the drive that many Pleasanton residents must now take to patronize Costco <br /> stores in Livermore and San Ramon. It would generate many new jobs, perhaps proving life-changing <br /> economic opportunities for the homeless families that I hear are now living under our bridges and <br /> beside our arroyos. Its location near the 1580/1680 is good for traffic flow with only minimal necessary <br /> alterations to the roadway to accommodate the added vehicular traffic on Stoneridge Drive and Johnson <br /> Drive. And,the opposition by local business owners is not supportable by the facts. I understand the <br /> opposition is led by Bill Wheeler, CEO of Black Tie Transportation, a large commercial business near the <br /> proposed industrial zone. If Mr. Wheeler is so opposed to Costco, why does he refer to Johnson Drive as <br /> "Commercial Drive" on Black Tie's website? If he is concerned about traffic, why doesn't he provide an <br /> adequate off-road parking facility for his employees instead of forcing them to park on Johnson Drive, <br /> thereby creating a traffic hazard and a pedestrian hazard seeing there is no crosswalk anywhere near <br /> where his employees must cross the road. Thanks for inviting my input. Jim. <br /> James Brice <br /> December 2015—April 2016(3) 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.