Laserfiche WebLink
4.Written Comments on the Draft EIR and Responses to Comments <br /> I. Construct a third eastbound left-turn lane from Stoneridge Drive to Johnson Drive in <br /> conjunction with an additional northbound receiving lane on Johnson Drive(north <br /> side of intersection). <br /> 2. Construct an additional southbound right-turn lane on Johnson Drive. <br /> 3. Rebuild Johnson Drive as a six lane facility with three or four southbound lanes and <br /> three northbound receiving lanes for a minimum of 700 feet north of Stoneridge <br /> Drive. This improvement would require widening of Johnson Drive north of <br /> Stoneridge Drive by up to 36 feet and widening of Johnson Drive south of Stoneridge <br /> Drive a commensurate amount to align travel movements through the intersection. <br /> A fun hauj,ta o eyed by the City nrior to the <br /> issuance of the first building permit for a Phase I use that would generate 100 or more PM <br /> Peak-hour tries. <br /> Mitigation Measure 4.1)-Id: Stoneridge Drive Queue Spillback(Stoneridge Drive and <br /> Johnson Drive Improvements). • '• • t- , ' • • . . - • • ••41 • - <br /> trst use in Phase 1 that would generate 100 or more PM or Saturday Peak-hour trinssh.e <br /> Ci y shalLensure the implementation the following improvements: <br /> 1. Modify the Stoneridge Drive at Northbound 1-680 off-ramp to provide a northbound <br /> right-turn overlap phase. <br /> 2. Construct a second southbound left-turn lane from Johnson Drive to Stoneridge <br /> Drive. <br /> 3. Extend the existing westbound right-turn pocket at the Johnson Drive and Stoneridge <br /> Drive intersection approximately 800 feet east by widening Stoneridge Drive and <br /> convert the resulting lane into a through-right-shared lane. Install lane markings in <br /> the curb lane and adjacent lane indicating 1-680 Northbound Only to reduce lane <br /> changes between Johnson Drive and the northbound on-ramp. <br /> 4. Construct a second on-ramp lane to northbound 1-680 from the westbound Stoneridge <br /> Drive approach. The two lane on-ramp should be merged to one lane prior to the <br /> freeway merge area. The lane drop will occur over a distance of at least 800 feet,and <br /> will require reconstruction and widening of the bridge at this on-ramp from one to <br /> two lanes, with the merge occurring after the bridge. (Note: This improvement is <br /> within Caltrans right-of-way and requires Caltrans design review and oversight.) <br /> funding mechanism for these imnrovements shall be annroved by the City nrior to the <br /> issuance of the first buildint_•e mit_fvta Phase 1 use tha . • ild •-•crate 100 or more <br /> PM or Saturday peakrhour trios. <br /> Developer Responsibility for Funding Traffic Mitigation Measures <br /> Several reviewers of the Draft SEIR expressed concern about the cost of infrastructure <br /> improvements compared to the revenue generated by new uses within the EDZ area. The City <br /> currently estimates that these improvements may total approximately $15 million. Funding for the <br /> improvements will be provided by some combination from developers of individual sites within <br /> the EDZ(via traffic impact fees); State and federal funds that the City will apply for; and revenue <br /> from property and sales taxes provided by new uses within the EDZ via the City's General Fund. <br /> Johnson Dnve Economic Development Zone 4-7 ESA 1 140421 <br /> Supplemental EIR Response to Comments March 2016 <br />