Laserfiche WebLink
directives were implemented as affirmed by the City Council, including lowering of lot thirty-two (32), <br /> movement of the cul-de-sac, and shortening the Lund Ranch extension. Ms. Ramirez stated that the <br /> road would be moved between zero (0) and seventy-five (75)feet. <br /> The Mayor closed the public hearing. <br /> Councilmember Olson stated he was going to support the plan and that Measure PP has impacted this <br /> project. The Council has not blatantly disregarded the Measure, but rather been conservative in its <br /> interpretations by removing five (5) lots. He is not in favor of removing any more lots in this <br /> development and the Council is not setting a precedent. No one will see the road except for the people <br /> who live in this development. It is true that years ago he said that a road was a structure, however he <br /> had to change his position in order to get to this point. He made a motion to approve staffs <br /> recommendation. <br /> Councilmember Brown acknowledged that she was a Measure PP signature gatherer and stated that it <br /> was adopted to provide hillside protection, whether one hundred (100) feet from a ridge, or within the <br /> City limits of Pleasanton. There should be no development in the top one hundred (100) feet from a <br /> ridge, no scarring, no severe grading, in order to protect the scenic ridgelines for future generations. <br /> Once they are gone, they can never come back. When the hiking trails are developed hundreds of <br /> people will see the new roads and homes. Measure PP was enacted to protect ridges, a road is not an <br /> open space, and the parking along the side of the road will not be well received. <br /> Vice Mayor Narum seconded the motion made by Councilmember Olson. She stated that the Council is <br /> honoring Measure PP with this proposal and it had gone from one hundred twenty-five (125) homes <br /> since 1996 down to forty-three (43). Seven (7) proposed homes had been removed from the proposal <br /> to get in compliance with Measure PP. The Council is cognizant of ridgelines and one of the actions <br /> taken unanimously by the Council was to add ridgeline mapping to the annual Workplan. The City is <br /> receiving one hundred seventy (170) acres of open space and it is beautiful land for hiking. Measure <br /> PP worked, and although she was not an initial supporter, it did work and the residents should be proud <br /> of this development proposal. <br /> Mayor Thome stated that the proposal before the Council was a reasonable compromise and a <br /> reasonable split of the traffic. The project is coming down one hundred (100) houses because of <br /> Measure PP. He originally felt the road by the barn was man made, but because of some doubt, he <br /> commented that if a road was not placed there the project would be inconsistent with others. He called <br /> for the vote. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Olson/Narum to waive second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2133 <br /> approving the application of Greenbriar Homes Communities for Planned Unit Development (PUD) <br /> Rezoning and Development Plan approval of 43 homes, as filed under Case PUD-25; waive second <br /> reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2134 approving the Development Agreement between the City of <br /> Pleasanton and Greenbriar Homes Communities; waive full reading and adopt Resolution No. 16-819 <br /> approving the revised CEQA Findings and the Mitigation and Monitoring and Reporting program; and <br /> authorized staff to take appropriate steps to effectuate Council's intent consistent with the above <br /> approvals. <br /> Motion passed by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Olson, Narum, Mayor Thome <br /> Noes: Brown <br /> Absent: Pentin <br /> City Council Minutes Page 5 of 6 January 5,2016 <br />