My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 16835
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
RES 16835
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2017 11:04:53 AM
Creation date
3/3/2016 1:05:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/1/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
16835
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resolution No.16-835 <br /> Exhibit A . <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL <br /> PUD-25, GHC Lund Ranch, LLC <br /> Lund Ranch II <br /> 1500 Lund Ranch Road <br /> • <br /> January 5, 2016 <br /> PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS <br /> Plannino Division <br /> 1. The proposed development shall be in substantial conformance to Exhibit B, <br /> dated "Received, February 27, 2012," including Site Development Plan, <br /> Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan, Landscape Plans, Building Floor Plans and <br /> Elevations, and Color Samples," on file with the Planning Division, as modified by <br /> the City Council on December 1, 2015 and December 15, 2015 as follows: <br /> a. Modify the proposed site plan to reflect the site plan (Exhibit A-1) <br /> presented by the applicant at the December 1, 2015 City Council meeting <br /> consisting of 43 units: 31 units accessed by Sunset Creek, and 12 units <br /> accessed by Lund Ranch Road. <br /> b. Circulation between the two neighborhoods shall be permanently (in <br /> perpetuity) separated, with through access available only to pedestrians, <br /> bicycles and emergency vehicles. The applicant shall work with City staff <br /> on a suitable physical barrier, beyond just bollards, to ensure it appears <br /> permanent, and is nicely landscaped and attractive. <br /> c. The applicant shall work with City staff to locate the road connection to <br /> Sunset Creek Lane to the least environmentally significant alignment and <br /> to minimize grading to greatest extent possible. In this case, relative to <br /> the requirements of Measure PP, the City Council considers this road to <br /> be infrastructure and not a structure. <br /> d. Ensure that all housing structures are outside the 100-foot vertical setback <br /> line. On the southwest edge of the site, the vertical setback shall be <br /> measured from a ridge that ends at the 580-foot elevation, as originally <br /> mapped. <br /> e. Although the City Council finds that the northern ridge does not extend <br /> below 718 feet as previously mapped, the Lot 32 building pad shall be <br /> lowered to no higher than elevation 500 feet. <br /> f. Lots 34, 35, 36, 37, and 38, as shown on the Preliminary Grading and <br /> Utility Plan, dated November 24, 2015, reflecting 48 units, shall be <br /> removed from the project and left as open space. Minimal grading to <br /> prevent erosion shall be allowed in this open space area. <br /> g. If the City Council's interpretation of Measure PP or project approval is <br /> successfully challenged legally, the entire project approval (including this <br /> ordinance) is considered null and void, and must return to the Planning <br /> Page 1 of 31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.