My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN021616
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
CCMIN021616
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2017 1:46:56 PM
Creation date
3/3/2016 12:48:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/16/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the proposed road in the Lund Ranch development violates Measure PP and will have various negative <br />impacts on the hillsides. He noted that the opposition to the referendum has stated the referendum <br />election will cost thousands of dollars. He confirmed that the Council has the option of rescinding the <br />Ordinance and avoiding an election. He suggested a compromise to the Ventana Hills group and <br />suggested that all parties, including the developer and the City, focus on a solution that provides the <br />developer with use of their land in conformance with Measure PP. <br />Bill Wheeler, owner of Black Tie Transportation, spoke about the Johnson Drive Economic <br />Development Zone. At a recent Chamber of Commerce meeting, he stated that a representative of <br />Neuron commented that, "Costco is coming." He expressed concerns that the Planning Commission <br />staff rejected a project proposal that would better suit the community, even though it would not <br />generate as much revenue as a Costco. In recent pollings, he stated that many in the Pleasanton <br />community do not want more big box stores, more crime, more traffic, and more development. Similar <br />to the Lund Ranch matter, this issue is dividing the community and many do not see the sense in letting <br />a big corporation dictate what happens with development in Pleasanton. He stated that Vice Mayor <br />Narum suggested he attend an upcoming workshop on the matter to express his concerns and provide <br />input, however the date for the workshop keeps moving. In closing, he claimed that people will find <br />ways to take these matters in their own hands through the ballot box. <br />Came Cox, Cox Family Stores, commented that she attended a Bay Area Air Quality meeting where it <br />was shared that even though Costco would increase pollution, the organization had no jurisdiction over <br />the City of Pleasanton. She expressed concerns that even the Supplemental Environmental Impact <br />Report concludes that the traffic and pollution impacts would be significant. It is her contention that the <br />City Council is the only legislative body with jurisdiction over this matter and that has the ability to <br />address the negative impacts that a Costco will bring. This includes 3,000 — 4,000 cars per day that will <br />be idling when waiting to fuel and 180 delivery trucks per month. She expressed concern that the City <br />Council did not care about pollution and was only interested in the revenue. She referenced a recent <br />newspaper stating that Mayor Thorne was seeking his third term and that he stated in the article that <br />any proposed Johnson Drive project will have full vetting. She also referenced a comment made by <br />Neuron that the Costco was a "done deal." <br />Mayor Thorne denied stating that a Costco was "inevitable." He only stated that it was one of the many <br />possible projects and proposals that could be presented and there will be full public vetting for all. <br />John Bauer stated that he attended two of the Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone workshops. <br />City staff listened to concerns, answered all questions and provided handouts and clarifying <br />information. He felt the key "take aways" from the meeting were that the Johnson Drive Economic <br />Development Zone was just a proposal and that no changes will be made until a full evaluation is <br />publically conducted. This will also be the first time this type of Zone would be introduced in the City. <br />His wife would be happy if a Costco came to Pleasanton. He is waiting for the joint meetings between <br />the Planning Commission and the City Council and other workshops before he makes his decision. He <br />read the article that Mayor Thorne is running for his third term, and was shocked by the quote attributed <br />to Mayor Thorne in the newspaper about "rezoning property on Johnson Drive." Mr. Bauer strongly <br />suggested that the Zone be fully vetted by the process involving a joint hearing between Planning <br />Commission and City Council and then more public hearings. He strongly urged Mayor Thorne to follow <br />the process he had previously endorsed. <br />Mayor Thorne stated he is not pushing for any particular business but he would like to see the study <br />done. <br />Greg Wohlenberg thanked the volunteer signature gatherers who worked diligently to collect signatures <br />for the referendum on the Lund Ranch II project. In speaking with residents, he heard a consistent <br />support for slow and moderate growth and traffic protections throughout the community. They are proud <br />to be part of the referendum effort and he again sent a thank you to the committed residents. <br />City Council Minutes Page 3 of 5 February 16, 2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.