Laserfiche WebLink
CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT <br /> FOR <br /> LUND RANCH II (PUD-25) PROJECT <br /> SECTION 1 STATEMENT OF FINDINGS <br /> INTRODUCTION <br /> GHC Lund Ranch, LLC is requesting approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) <br /> development plan, which would allow the construction of a total of 50 residential units on the <br /> 195-acre Lund Ranch II property. The project site is presently designated for Rural Density (1 <br /> dwelling unit per 5 gross acres) and Low Density (less than 2 dwelling units per gross acres) <br /> Residential uses. The subject property is zoned "PUD-LDR/OS," Planned Unit Development — <br /> Low Density Residential) District. The project plans designate the majority of the Lund Ranch <br /> property for open space uses. Approximately 161 acres (83%) of the site would be dedicated for <br /> public open space use, while 11.1 acres of the two lots would be undeveloped private open <br /> space area. The public open space would be owned by the City and maintained by either the <br /> City or the development's homeowners' association (HOA). <br /> The City of Pleasanton ("City"), as lead agency, prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report <br /> (EIR) for the Project in July, 2014 (State Clearinghouse No. 2003092021)1. This document was <br /> made available for review on July 15, 2014, for a forty-five (45) day review period. Accordingly, <br /> written comments were solicited until September 2, 2014. The City of Pleasanton prepared <br /> responses to comments on the Draft EIR, and published both comments and responses to <br /> comments in the January 2015 Final EIR, which was distributed on January 12, 2015. <br /> These findings have been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act <br /> (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) and its implementing guidelines ("CEQA <br /> Guidelines") (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.). <br /> FINDINGS REQUIRED UNDER CEQA <br /> Public Resources Code section 21002 provides that "public agencies should not approve <br /> projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available <br /> which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects[.]" The <br /> same statute provides that the procedures required by CEQA "are intended to assist public <br /> agencies in systematically identifying both the significant effects of Projects and the feasible <br /> alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or substantially lessen such <br /> significant effects." Section 21002 goes on to provide that "in the event [that] specific economic, <br /> social, or other conditions make infeasible such project alternatives or such mitigation <br /> 1 See Cal.Code Regs.,tit. 14,section 15367 for a definition of"lead agency." <br /> LUND RANCH II (PUD-25) RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 1 FINDINGS <br />