RES 16819 - Laserfiche WebLink

TABLE 1. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures' Implementation Monitoring Monitoring and Monitoring Verification of Procedures Responsibility Reporting Action Schedule Compliance occupied habitat.These measures may be necessary to ensure that owls are not harmed or injured during construction,and that the loss of occupied habitat is mitigated. Mitigation for the loss of occupied habitat could be accomplished on or off the property,subject to approval of a mitigation land management plan by CDFG. Mitigation Measure 4.3-5: The proposed project would Project applicant Community Review and approve Prior to issuance Verified by: impact approximately 0.022 acre of Waters of the United shall hire a qualified Development a qualified wetlands of grading or States(0.016 acre and 243 lineal feet of drainage wetlands biologist Department; biologist and building permit, channel waters, and 0.006 acre of in-channel wetlands). approved by the City Planning Division wetland restoration whichever is The connection to Sunset Creek Lane would require of Pleasanton who plan sooner. approximately 100 linear feet(400 square feet)of will prepare a plan Date: additional impact. While compensation for impacts to for creation of Verify inclusion of all Review monitoring Waters of the United States shall occur at a minimum of appropriate permit-required reports for wetland a 1:1 replacement ratio,the CDFW and RWQCB replacement measures in restoration sites generally require a replacement ratio of 2:1 or better. To wetlands that applicable for a minimum of the degree possible,the applicant shall replace lost adheres to all construction plans five years and wetland resources in kind. Thus,the project would specifications in this and specifications. verify that required create channel and seasonal drainage at least at a 1:1 measure and will monitoring reports ratio,including a 1:1 ratio of seasonal wetlands on the verify in writing that Inspect site during have been Lund Ranch property based on the final calculation of the plan adheres to construction to submitted to impact. Creation of new channels can be logistically all guidance that is ensure compliance Responsible difficult as there are finite areas within a site to applicable to the with project Agencies. accomplish this type of mitigation. Therefore,some project,including construction plans. mitigation for the seasonal channel may have to be out- conditions imposed of-kind.This could be accomplished by creating as part of all additional seasonal wetlands. Responsible Agency The site supports sufficient opportunities to permits needed for accommodate creation of wetland habitat. Even if the this work. project could not create 1:1 ratio of channel,there are a number of areas along Drainage Areas A and B and within the non-jurisdictional drainage swales on the site that could easily accommodate this type of creation mitigation. The goal of this mitigation should be to create new wetlands and enhance existing wetlands in a way that replaces the functions and values of the wetlands that are proposed to be filled. A qualified biologist should develop a restoration plan that identifies the full extent of the impact,location of suitable sites to create or enhance wetlands of the necessary acreage,and develop success criteria specific to the actual wetland creation design. The mitigation site should be monitored for at least five years.A detailed wetland restoration plan should be LUND RANCH II-PUD-25 7 JANUARY 2016