My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
010516
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2015 3:26:28 PM
Creation date
12/29/2015 3:26:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/5/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mitigation Measure 4.14-2: Prior to issuance of any Grading or Demolition Permit, the City Engineer <br /> and the Chief Building Official shall confirm that the building plans and specifications incorporate the <br /> following features: <br /> a. Roofs that are strong enough and have roof truss spacing to hold photovoltaic panels, where <br /> feasible and cost effective, in compliance with Program 7.5 of the Energy Element of <br /> Pleasanton General Plan 2005 - 2025. <br /> b. Solar water heating and/or photovoltaic-ready roofs in new construction, i.e., roofs with <br /> wiring installed for a roof-mounted photovoltaic system, where feasible, in compliance with <br /> Program 7.5 of the Energy Element of Pleasanton General Plan 2005 - 2025. <br /> FINDINGS REGARDING FURTIMF.R ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br /> In light of the entire administrative record for the Project, the City finds that there is no significant new <br /> information (within the meaning of CEQA) that requires recirculation of the SEIR preparation of a <br /> subsequent environmental impact report. (See CEQA Guideline 15088.5 15162.) <br /> The City Council approved modifications to the Applicant's proposal that reflect a variant of EIR <br /> Alternative 3. Consistent with that alternative, the project would have connections to both Lund Ranch <br /> Road and Sunset Creek Lane. The location of that connection has been adjusted from the illustrative <br /> figures from Court C to Court B. Also, access to the street connections has been limited, which reduces <br /> the maximum traffic that will use either road compared to the EIR alternative. 29-31 units would connect <br /> to Sunset Creek Lane and -1-9-12 units would connect to Lund Ranch Road. The project has also been <br /> reduced from 50 units to-48 43 units and Lot 32 : - . . • - . . - has been <br /> reduced to 500 feet in elevation. <br /> None of these approved modifications amount to significant new information that would require <br /> recirculation of the EIR preparation of a subsequent EIR. <br /> CEQA Section 15088.5 15162 generally requires-an a subsequent EIR to bey prepared when <br /> there have been substantial changes in the project or circumstances that result in new or substantially <br /> increased impacts, or when "significant new information" new information of substantial importance that <br /> was not known, and could not have been known, at the time of certification of the EIR. is added to the <br /> EIR prior to certification. "Significant new information" requiring recirculation can include a disclosure <br /> mitigation measure proposed to be implemented; or a substantial increase in the severity of an <br /> level of insignificance. <br /> The City has reviewed the documents submitted by the Applicant regarding the scope of impacts <br /> associated with the project modifications and the City concludes that the Project modifications will not <br /> result in any new or substantially increased impacts than those already disclosed by the EIR, therefore <br /> recirculation a subsequent EIR is not required. The evidence presented to the City confirms that the <br /> EIR's conclusion in the alternatives section that a second connection to Sunset Creek Lane (Scenario 3) <br /> would have certain incrementally increased environmental impacts, including increased grading on steep <br /> slopes. However, none of these increased impacts would result in new or substantially increased impacts. <br /> For example, the impacts associated with the connection to Sunset Creek Lane will be mitigated to less- <br /> than-significant levels with the existing Biological Resources, Geology and Soils, and Hydrology and <br /> Water Quality mitigations measures. In addition, NPDES construction and municipal permit <br /> requirements, in combination with the conditions of approval, will ensure that any increased stormwater <br /> impacts associated with the second connection will not result in new or substantially increased significant <br /> LUND RANCH II(PUD-25)RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 22 FINDINGS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.