My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 15810
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
RES 15810
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2015 2:50:49 PM
Creation date
12/29/2015 2:50:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/1/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RES 15810
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT <br /> FOR <br /> LUND RANCH II (PUD-25) PROJECT <br /> SECTION 1 STATEMENT OF FINDINGS <br /> INTRODUCTION <br /> GHC Lund Ranch, LLC is requesting approval of a Planned Unit Development(PUD)development plan, <br /> which would allow the construction of a total of 50 residential units on the 195-acre Lund Ranch II <br /> property. The project site is presently designated for Rural Density(1 dwelling unit per 5 gross acres)and <br /> Low Density(less than 2 dwelling units per gross acres) Residential uses. The subject property is zoned <br /> "PUD-LDR/OS,"Planned Unit Development— Low Density Residential)District. The project plans <br /> designate the majority of the Lund Ranch property for open space uses. Approximately 161 acres(83%) <br /> of the site would be dedicated for public open space use, while 11.1 acres of the two estate lots would be <br /> undeveloped private open space area. The public open space would be owned by the City and maintained <br /> by either the City or the development's homeowners' association(HOA). <br /> The City of Pleasanton("City"), as lead agency, prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report(EIR) for <br /> the Project in July, 2014 (State Clearinghouse No. 2003092021)'. This document was made available for <br /> review on July 15, 2014, for a forty-five(45)day review period. Accordingly, written comments were <br /> solicited until September 2,2014. The City of Pleasanton prepared responses to comments on the Draft <br /> EIR,and published both comments and responses to comments in the January 2015 Final EIR,which was <br /> distributed on January 12, 2015. <br /> These findings have been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) <br /> (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.)and its implementing guidelines("CEQA Guidelines")(Cal. Code <br /> Regs.,tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.). <br /> FINDINGS REQUIRED UNDER CEQA <br /> Public Resources Code section 21002 provides that"public agencies should not approve projects as <br /> proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would <br /> substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects[.]"The same statute provides <br /> that the procedures required by CEQA"are intended to assist public agencies in systematically identifying <br /> both the significant effects of Projects and the feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which <br /> will avoid or substantially lessen such significant effects." Section 21002 goes on to provide that"in the <br /> event [that] specific economic, social, or other conditions make infeasible such project alternatives or <br /> such mitigation measures, individual projects may be approved in spite of one or more significant effects <br /> thereof." <br /> 1 See Cal.Code Regs.,tit. 14,section 15367 for a definition of`lead agency." <br /> LUND RANCH II(PUD-25)RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 1 FINDINGS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.