My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
121515
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2015 1:26:09 PM
Creation date
12/11/2015 2:21:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/15/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
line drawn in terms of how much pre-work staff does for the developer versus letting the <br /> developer look at his site plan and say, looking at the topography of his site, these are <br /> probably ridge lines; sitting down with staff and going through that review; and at least <br /> getting a preliminary review from staff at that time. He added that he could carry this to <br /> say what about wetlands, and go ahead and map. <br /> Chair Blank stated that developers sit down with staff and spend hundreds of thousands <br /> of dollars doing all these plans, and then they come before the Commission, and the <br /> Commission says that it's not sure that is the ridgeline, or that it is too dense for that <br /> area; then the developer will have to go back and redo the plans, then have to go to the <br /> City Council and, depending on the political composition of the Council at the time, they <br /> might get a completely different answer. He added that that is not certainty. He <br /> indicated that he does not believe that it will take six months to do a ridgeline inventory; <br /> it is not that complicated, and he does not buy it. <br /> Commissioner Posson stated that he does not argue the technical feasibility of doing it, <br /> but he is just concerned about whether or not that is a good utilization of staff time, <br /> whether staff should be doing it or whether that's something the developers should do <br /> as part of their development plan. <br /> Chair Blank stated that if the developers do it as part of their development plan, each <br /> one will be different, and each one will get a different decision. <br /> Commissioner Pearce stated that referencing the Historic Preservation Task Force <br /> Chair Blank mentioned, the Task Force is talking about doing a survey of old buildings <br /> in town and providing every single resident, developer, and commercial property owner <br /> with certainty as to what properties are in and what are out, what are historical <br /> resources and what are not. She indicated that the reason she asked about how long <br /> this would take and what it would involve is because this issue is amorphous and has a <br /> lot of moving parts; it does not feel like something that has been nailed down. She <br /> added that she believes it will help provide certainty. <br /> Commissioner Pearce stated that she would rather give the direction to the City Council <br /> and if staff comes back and says, for example, this is going to cost $1 million or will take <br /> three years, the Council can consider it. She noted that given that the Commission <br /> prefers the certainty upfront and that it cannot seem to get that information ahead of <br /> time, she would prefer to take the conservative approach and propose to the City <br /> Council that it at least get the details before turning it down. <br /> Commissioner Posson asked Commissioner Pearce is she is proposing a <br /> recommendation to the City Council to consider having an inventory of the ridgelines. <br /> Commissioner Pearce said yes. <br /> Commissioner Posson continued that it would not be included in the ordinance. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 13, 2013 Page 23 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.