My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
121515
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2015 1:26:09 PM
Creation date
12/11/2015 2:21:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/15/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Blank agreed. He stated that to him, it fits the "within" definition and not the <br /> "place" definition. <br /> Commissioner Pearce noted that staff is focusing on the word "place" and not the word <br /> "within." <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that was correct. <br /> Chair Blank inquired if Lund Ranch II has a vested development. <br /> Mr. Dolan said no. He added that there is a development proposal that has not been <br /> approved yet. <br /> Chair Blank inquired if, for example, Lund Ranch were to come forward with a <br /> ten-house development proposal or less, that proposal would not be subject to these <br /> restrictions. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that is correct. <br /> Chair Blank commented that, theoretically, realizing that that development would <br /> generate some traffic, that would be the traffic of ten homes, much like the withdrawn <br /> development application that was made for Oak Grove. He then asked if there were <br /> any comments from staff on the inventory of hills. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that he had basically said that staff thinks it could be a very long and <br /> contentious process, and staff is not in the position to do that at this point. He added <br /> that staff is not going to initiate a six-month exercise, or however long it would take, at <br /> the Planning Commission level. He indicated that ultimately, the City Council could <br /> direct staff to do that and staff would do it. <br /> Commissioner Narum inquired if"long" means six months, a year, or something else. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that he cannot really project who is going to make what arguments on <br /> that and predict the outcome but that he thinks it would be a long process. <br /> Commissioner Narum inquired if that would hold up any pending development <br /> applications moving in that direction. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that it would hold up Lund Ranch, which is active right now, but that is <br /> not necessarily the reason. He stated that it is just a matter of trying to get this <br /> ordinance adopted, and taking that side trip is not something staff is interested in doing <br /> at this point. <br /> Commissioner Pearce inquired what staff believes is involved with doing an inventory. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 13, 2013 Page 21 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.