My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
121515
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2015 1:26:09 PM
Creation date
12/11/2015 2:21:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/15/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dolan continued that, in terms of this discussion, there is a possible secondary <br /> access through Middleton Place, which will definitely be a topic of discussion when that <br /> project is reviewed. He added, however, that for the purposes of this discussion, Lund <br /> Ranch Road, Sunset Creek Lane, and Sycamore Creek Way are the most important. <br /> He emphasized that regardless of which way the Commission decides, staff feels it is <br /> very important that the Commission understand these real world implications of what its <br /> decision implies. <br /> Mr. Dolan then displayed a slide showing the topography off of the end of Sunset Creek <br /> Lane, which he calls minor areas of 25-percent slope. He indicated that the way access <br /> was planned to be achieved would be at the end of Sunset Creek Lane, where an <br /> easement was reserved for the sole purpose of providing access to the Lunch Ranch <br /> property. He added that the CC&R's for that subdivision indicate that that connection <br /> will be made in the future when the Lund Ranch property is developed. He noted, <br /> however, that taking that road and getting it down to the flat part of the Lund Ranch <br /> property would entail traversing an area that is a fairly crude measurement of the <br /> 25-percent slope. He added that the width of that roadway would be probably similar to <br /> that of Sunset Creek Lane, but because of the steepness, it would have fairly <br /> substantial grading on each side of the cut above and the fill below. He further added <br /> that at about the 450-foot elevation below, there is also a creek to cross, which is a <br /> challenge but is something that could be done. <br /> Chair Blank asked Mr. Dolan to elaborate on what he meant by "a challenge but could <br /> be done." <br /> Mr. Dolan explained that environmentally, there is an expense to crossing a creek <br /> because it needs to be done in a certain way to avoid habitat. He noted, however, that <br /> this was anticipated to be done, at least in the North Sycamore Specific Plan. <br /> Mr. Dolan continued that the other issue is the Happy Valley Bypass Road. He <br /> displayed a picture of the Spotorno Property with Westbridge Lane going across the <br /> bottom and the alignment of the proposed Bypass Road. He noted that the Bypass <br /> Road goes around the toe of the steeper slopes at the bottom, but as it moves towards <br /> the top and up Sycamore Creek Way, there are substantial areas of 25-percent slope <br /> that would have to be traversed. <br /> Mr. Dolan indicated that he would consider this issue to be the most difficult and one <br /> that will have the most discussion about. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 13, 2013 Page 7 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.