My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
121515
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2015 1:26:09 PM
Creation date
12/11/2015 2:21:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/15/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Narum asked Ms. Diamond to give some examples of where this <br /> housing for agricultural employees would apply within the City. <br /> Ms. Diamond replied that most of the Agricultural zones where agriculture is occurring <br /> now are in Specific Plan areas or in PUDs, and most of them are in the southern end or <br /> western end of the City. She indicated that it would be the PUDs or Specific Plans that <br /> would govern those agricultural uses and not necessarily this Code amendment. She <br /> noted that there may be some agriculturally zoned properties that are not within PUD's <br /> or within Specific Plan areas, most of which are being utilized for other uses such as <br /> parks or school sites. <br /> Ms. Diamond stated that the biggest impact would be on an R-1 lot and in R-1-zoned <br /> (Single-Family Residential) areas which are spread throughout the City. She added that <br /> there are currently a number of agricultural uses that are allowed by right, and the <br /> Zoning Code does not specify whether they are for commercial or domestic purposes <br /> only. She noted that someone with a large R-1 lot could be growing crops for sale at a <br /> farmer's market or to a restaurant, and through this Code amendment, those would now <br /> be subject to a Conditional Use Permit. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired if those business that are already on-going would be <br /> allowed to continue. <br /> Ms. Diamond said yes. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor further inquired if a business license would be required for <br /> commercial purposes. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that those would require a business license. <br /> Ms. Diamond stated that staff did a search of business licenses, and only two <br /> businesses in the City came up as agricultural businesses: one was retail and the other <br /> was basically an office use. She noted that when they did another search under <br /> alcohol-related businesses, they came up with a handful of wineries that are in <br /> operation in the City, and those are within PUDs. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired how this regulation would apply to areas outside the <br /> City's Urban Growth Boundary but still within Pleasanton's Sphere of Influence. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that because it only applies to standard zoning districts, it would not <br /> apply outside the City boundaries. <br /> Chair Blank noted that prior to World War I, Pleasanton was a large producer of hops <br /> and inquired if there are any commercial agricultural sites in the City. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that the Irby property is zoned Agricultural. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 13, 2013 Page 9 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.