Laserfiche WebLink
Amy Lofland decided to speak and read part of a prepared statement into the record: <br /> "Good evening. My name is Amy Lofland. I live at , which is in Ventana <br /> Hills, and I'm a member of the Ventana Hills Steering Committee. Our Committee <br /> was formed as a result of a motion adopted by the Pleasanton City Council at the <br /> April 2, 1990 meeting to provide orderly input and successful negotiations for the <br /> adoption of the Bonde Ranch development known as PUD-90-18. All five members <br /> still comprise the Committee and we all reside in Ventana Hills. The Committee has <br /> and has had consistent communication with the residents of our development for <br /> over 20 plus years. <br /> `I'd like to give you a little history into southeastern Pleasanton planning, particularly <br /> with regard to traffic flow. This is an area where the proposed chapter implementing <br /> Measures PP and QQ into City Code will affect future development. Back in 1990 <br /> and 1991, with the development of Bonde Ranch, the proposal of Callippe Golf <br /> Course, and the development plans along Sycamore, it was clear to existing <br /> neighborhoods and to the City that a plan was necessary for southeastern <br /> Pleasanton, particularly for traffic that would come from new developments. The <br /> neighborhoods of Alisal, Happy Valley, Sycamore, Pleasanton Heights, Mission <br /> Park, Old Town, and Ventana Hills, to name most, participated in many City-run <br /> workshops to come up with mitigation plans for the development of this area. These <br /> City-initiated meetings with the citizens of Pleasanton and neighborhood <br /> representatives took many hours and shaped the final outcome of the North <br /> Sycamore Specific Plan and the Happy Valley Specific Plan. We worked to <br /> preserve existing neighborhoods and to regulate the effects of future development <br /> and traffic flow so that the adverse effects would not be too great. There was <br /> compromise with regard to all that on all sides. <br /> "The Planning Commission and the City Council, if they intend to consider roads a <br /> structure, then it is important to grandfather both PUDs and Specific Plans into those <br /> approved prior to 2008 so that the roads that have been constructed or are planned <br /> to be constructed in the southeastern section of Pleasanton to support development <br /> and traffic flow can be used. As someone who voted for Measure PP to protect the <br /> ridgeline, it was not my intent to preclude the Happy Valley Specific Plan or the <br /> North Sycamore Specific Plan from future development plans, and I'm sure the <br /> neighborhoods of southeastern Pleasanton who worked in good faith with the City <br /> on these specific plans would agree." <br /> Ms. Lofland stated that she had more on her statement, but she just wanted to make <br /> sure the Commission had the history of how this all came about, since this item will not <br /> be considered at tonight's meeting <br /> Cindy LeLaurin, a resident of Bridle Creek, stated that she found it preposterous that <br /> she is standing in front of all the Commissioners again and fighting about Measure PP. <br /> She indicated that Bridle Creek residents really worked their tails off to get signatures to <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 13, 2013 Page 6 of 20 <br />