My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
121515
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2015 1:26:09 PM
Creation date
12/11/2015 2:21:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/15/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
center, would like some spillover visitors in the evening, and he is respectful of that. He <br /> reiterated, however, that he is concerned that the memory of that location just goes <br /> back too far and the folks who came to that club in years past are still going to <br /> remember, even though it is a new name, that that place was there. He added that he <br /> is also concerned about public safety and the costs to the Police Department. He <br /> inquired if the new owner pay for these costs, which he hopes they would. He recalled <br /> that there were multiple visits by the police on various weekends, on numerous <br /> weekends when I would drive by, and he recalled that the place was closed because <br /> there was a shooting. He stated that he is sure Pleasanton residents remember that <br /> and will for a long time, and he does not see why people from San Jose, San Francisco, <br /> Oakland, and elsewhere in the Bay Area are not going to remember that and are not <br /> going to be attracted to this. He added that he was reading over the materials and it <br /> looked to him like the issues with this place go back to at least 1997 and 1998 before he <br /> even moved to town, and he would not be surprised if it went back even further. <br /> Mr. Sowell stated that one of the uses he would like to see for this location is a greater <br /> emphasis on a place where young people; teenagers, can gather and have fun. He <br /> indicated that his twin sons are now 14 years. He noted that over a year or two ago, the <br /> City put on events at Hart Middle School on Friday nights, but budget cuts have since <br /> prevented that from going on. He stated that it was essentially a place where teens who <br /> were older than the Pump It Up or Super Franks set could go. He noted that those were <br /> great places for these teens. He added that as far as he knows, except for Boomer's in <br /> Livermore and maybe Super Franks to some extent, there is no place for children 12 to <br /> 18 or 14 to 18 to go that would be actually fun to go to. He indicated that he would like <br /> for there to be a period during the week where maybe 12- to 14-year-olds are welcome, <br /> and only within that age range would seem appropriate; and then maybe from 16 to <br /> 18 years at a different day and a different time. He reiterated that he thinks that would <br /> be great so the young people are in a safe place. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> Vice Chair Pearce asked Lt. Knox if the Police Department is comfortable with the <br /> operations as set forth in the Conditions of Approval. <br /> Lt. Knox said yes, as proposed, pending approval of the submitted security plan. <br /> Vice Chair Pearce inquired if he has seen the revised Conditions of Approval on the <br /> staff memo dated today. <br /> Lt. Knox said yes. <br /> Vice Chair Pearce noted that there is an altered condition in the memo that talks about <br /> calling the Police Department if somebody standing outside the property will not leave. <br /> She inquired if it is typical for the Police Department to do that. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 27, 2013 Page 16 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.