My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACH 05-06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
121515
>
18 ATTACH 05-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 11:01:40 AM
Creation date
12/9/2015 12:44:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/15/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACH 05-06
Document Relationships
18
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2015\121515
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> building is being renovated to be a little more pedestrian-centric to open up a little more <br /> to the street. He noted that it is being designed to be more amenable to an actual retail <br /> use as opposed to just an office use. <br /> Commissioner Nagler asked staff to describe what is going on behind it. <br /> Mr. Weinstein replied that it is a single-family house. <br /> Commissioner Balch asked what the height of the buildings are. <br /> Mr. Weinstein replied that the front-facing was an existing commercial/medical type of <br /> building that needed some work done with parking, and the back was a long, 32-foot <br /> high house located on the west side of the property. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor commented that if nothing was built on this vacant lot, it would <br /> basically show through the front of the lot from Peters Avenue. <br /> Commissioner Balch noted that on the other side of the big tall house is a big long <br /> driveway with a fence between it and the commercial in the front. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor asked staff is the current C-C zoning allows both residential <br /> and commercial. <br /> Mr. Luchini replied that it does to a degree, but the C-C zoning usually refers to <br /> multi-family residential and not necessarily single-family. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired if that could be something like the row of condos or <br /> apartments. <br /> Mr. Weinstein replied that typically in the C-C district, it would be a ground-level <br /> commercial space and then second-floor residential space. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired if that creates a grandfathering. <br /> Mr. Weinstein replied that members of the applicant team talked about the juxtaposition <br /> of zoning and Specific Plan designations here. He explained that the existing zoning is <br /> C-C, but it is designated for office uses in the Downtown Specific Plan, so there is this <br /> disconnect between what is in the Specific Plan and what the site is zoned for. He <br /> added that staff is looking at a slightly different interpretation for a similar site on Spring <br /> Street, but because this site is entirely street-facing either on St. Mary Street or Peters <br /> Avenue, staff is expecting all ground-floor commercial space and no ground-level <br /> residential space. <br /> Chair Allen inquired if this is in terms of the City's current standard. <br /> Mr. Weinstein said yes, in terms of the current land use policy on this site. <br /> Commissioner Balch recommended that the Commission look at the residential use <br /> versus the commercial use in relation to the applicant's request for this residential <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 11/182015 Page 8 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.