07 - Laserfiche WebLink

Scope of Work • 1 ` i upf1T= 'tr>r)ci_ a ,1,,1%?EIFf;i 6 The following describes the specific tasks Fehr&Peers -s The following work scope provides details on specific will undertake to update the 2009 model,including tasks that were outlined in the Request for Proposals, calibration/validation to a 2015 base year and with tasks separated for the Model Update,Baseline development of an Existing Plus Approved Projects Report and On-going Support.Many of the tasks within (EPAP)and Cumulative models.As part of this task,we the model update and baseline report phase are propose to convert the existing Cube Voyager model intended to be conducted in parallel,as the outputs into Cube Catalog.Catalog offers benefits over the ;d from one task become inputs to others.The tasks are Voyager platform such as scenario management,user generally presented in the order in which they will be management and reporting.The Catalog platform it undertaken,although many modeling tasks are iterative allows all model files to be maintained in one file, by nature and there will be some feedback between reducing the potential for errors and allowing for 1 tasks.City staff may elect to have us do some or all of multiple scenarios to be evaluated. these tasks;some tasks may be undertaken by staff,or it il may be decided that certain tasks are not necessary in Task 3.1:Model Network this situation.We are open to discussing all of the Fehr&Peers will work closely with the City and other options with staff. stakeholders to compile a list of roadway improvements ________—___—______ ___.________ that were completed between 2009 and 2015 that rI'B :7s i i;c 1 — '.':'DEL i:;'D;TE should be reflected in the updated base year model,and -- ---— - - - - planned improvement projects that should be included T ,:•. i i r: r f in the future year models.We will also review the We start each model update exercise with an initial kick- placement of centroid connectors. off meeting with City staff and other stakeholders,to As part of this task,we will develop a master network 9 discuss issues with the current model and desires for the Cube Geodatabase file.Using a geodatabase will allow updated model,and review data needs and availability. the City to store and edit files from a central location. -9 Outcomes of this meeting include: The City currently maintains the network files in GIS shape file so storing the files in a geodatabase will • Finalized scope of work facilitate the editing and transfer of files adding to the • Refined project schedule ease of use. 3 • List of data needs For areas outside Pleasanton,we will review the most current version of the Alameda CTC model networks and - develop a list of roadway improvements in Dublin and Using the most current version of the 2009 model,Fehr ..:Livermore to include in the updated model.This list will &Peers will review the model,including roadway be provided to City of Pleasanton staff for review prior network,land use inputs and model functionality,and to the master network being updated. 1 summarize the results in tabular format.Network maps ,$ will also be created.The intent of this task is to convey Task 3.2:Land Use Review ,i, the complex model information in an easy to read It is our understanding that City of Pleasanton staff is ._.,, format.This concise summary will highlight areas of taking the lead on updating the 2009 land use files to 'a further refinement and will be incorporated into the reflect development that has occurred since 2009 to —, model documentation.The review will be broadly create a new base year land use database,and is subcategorized into the following topic areas: reviewing other planning documents,including the City's Housing Element to update the EPAP and '' • Network Cumulative land use files.As part of this task,Fehr& -gi • Data Collection Peers will summarize the Base Year,EPAP and • Land Use Cumulative scenario land use files In a tabular and 1 • TAZ structure including school Zones graphical format.The projected growth will be • Trip Generation compared to other published documents.Fehr&Peers ' • Trip Distribution will flag potential land use issues,such as negative • Mode Choice growth within a TAZ or unexpected land use changes, 3 • Feedback mechanisms such as commercial development occurring in a • Assignment primarily residential zone,for City staff review. 7, • Miscellaneous 3 1 6