My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
120115
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2015 2:37:51 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 11:51:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/1/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
NOTES
THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 17, 2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PAGE 4-The In endent,NOV ER 1, 2008 <br /> - <br /> Skyline At Stake . . <br /> Measure PP, on the ballot as the result of a citizens' <br /> initiative signed by more than 5000 voters, places the <br /> fate of Pleasanton's southeastern skyline in the hands of <br /> the electorate. <br /> The measure — which will take effect immediately if <br /> it passes — will ban new homes on hilltops and higher <br /> slopes..Perhaps more importantly it will signal to the <br /> city's decision-makers, that the community wants this <br /> range.of hills saved from_urbanization, much like • <br /> Pleasanton Ridge on the west. <br /> Also On the ballot is Measure QQ. It calls for.a <br /> -planning process leading to the adoption of a hillside <br /> ordinance. The process could take several years to <br /> -complete and would be advisory in nature. The City <br /> Council would have no legal obligation to adopt the <br /> recommendations. <br /> There is no substantive reason for Measure QQ to be i <br /> on the ballot. The. Pleasanton General Plan already <br /> permits the City Council to undertake this kind of <br /> process. <br /> In other words, QQ is a total sham. It was put on the <br /> ballot in a 3-2 City Council vote, its real purpose to <br /> muddle the voters and subvert the citizen initiative. <br /> Mayor Jennifer Hosternian spearheaded it, betraying <br /> her constituents in doing so. <br /> Steve Brozosky, challenging Hosterman for mayor, <br /> staunchly backs Measure PP and .opposes QQ. <br /> Councilmembers Matt Sullivan and Cindy McGovern <br /> stand the same. McGovern has been especially active on <br /> this issue, writing the ballot arguments for PP and <br /> against QQ. Jerry Pentin, the lone challenger in the <br /> council race, opposes the citizen initiative, PP, and <br /> supports QQ. <br /> The preservation of the "southeastern hills, combined <br /> with the lands of Pleasanton Ridge Regional Park on the <br /> west, would create a beautiful greenbelt encircling <br /> Pleasanton in perpetuity. What a glorious gift to leave <br /> future generations! <br /> Pleasanton citizens,: vote "yes" on the citizens' <br /> initiative, Measure PP; "no" on that phony Measure QQ. <br /> We urge your votes also go to the three candidates <br /> who support PP and oppose. QQ: Steve Brozosky for <br /> mayor and Cindy McGovern and _M att Sullivan for <br /> reelection to-the council. <br /> Protect Pleasanton <br /> --pp - <br /> -- -yEson <br /> Save Pleasanton Hills <br /> • <br /> on - <br /> Endorsed by The_Valley Times,__ <br /> The Independent, and The Herald <br /> newspapers <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.