My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
120115
>
08 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:46:19 AM
Creation date
11/12/2015 11:12:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/1/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
08 ATTACHMENTS 9-16
NOTES
THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM 11-3-2015 MEETING
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Brozosky, and this is backed by emails. She noted that when Measure PP passed, <br /> it did protect Pleasanton's ridges, including the ridges on Lund Ranch II today. She <br /> added that the people who moved into the Sycamore area should appreciate all the <br /> history that went into their beautiful homes and accept their CC&Rs and 25 years of <br /> Pleasanton history. She pointed out that staffs Option 2 would hold that 25 years of <br /> history, and Option 3 would yet again be compromising but would be acceptable. She <br /> added that she supports staffs recommended 24-foot road. <br /> Mark Priscaro thanked Mr. Dolan for his clear and nicely-stated presentation. He stated <br /> that Junipero Street was designed to be a residential collector, not a thoroughfare which <br /> is currently taking cut-through commuter traffic daily from Bernal Avenue via <br /> Independence Drive, ending at the intersection at Sunol Boulevard. He noted that it has <br /> become a major arterial roadway handling close to 5,000 car trips per day, and because <br /> of this, the intersection located at Junipero Street and Sunol Boulevard has deteriorated <br /> to a Level of Service (LOS) F. He added that the completion of the large 350-apartment <br /> units/retail development at the corner of Bernal Avenue and Stanley Boulevard currently <br /> under construction will most certainly create even more cut-through traffic on Bernal <br /> Avenue through Independence Drive and Junipero Street to the Sunol Boulevard <br /> corridor, further adversely affecting their existing neighborhoods. He noted that City <br /> Traffic Engineer Mike Tassano never addressed this cut-through corridor at the time in <br /> 2013 when that project was being decided upon. <br /> Mr. Priscaro stated that through various City Council and Mayoral administrations, <br /> including various City staff, over the past 25 years, his neighborhood was consistently <br /> promised that all traffic from any Lund Ranch II development would exit through <br /> Sycamore Creek Way in Bridle Creek. He indicated that Option 3 is a compromise <br /> whereby 40 homes would enter and exit via Sunset Creek Lane, Sycamore Creek Way, <br /> and Bridle Creek, and 10 homes would end in a cul-de-sac with immediate access via <br /> Lund Ranch Road. He stated that together with the Ventana Hills Steering Committee, <br /> he felt this is a fair compromise balancing previous commitments made by the City, <br /> previous plans adopted by the City, and the concerns of all affected neighborhoods. He <br /> pointed out that they are already suffering from cut-through traffic, will be suffering even <br /> more once the Bernal Avenue/Stanley Boulevard project is completed, and now the <br /> Planning Commission is considering that they take on even more traffic. He stated that <br /> that is neither fair not right or equitable, and is unacceptable to the residents of Ventana <br /> Hills and Mission Hills. <br /> Mr. Priscaro stated that Councilmember Karla Brown stated back in 2013 with respect <br /> to the Bernal Avenue/Stanley Boulevard project, along with the additional high-density <br /> housing projects that were approved then and had collective effects on various <br /> neighborhoods throughout the City that "we all have to share the pain." He pointed out <br /> that the pain Bridle Creek residents should be sharing with the rest of the community <br /> with Option 3 is very little and not asking too much. He asked the Commission to do <br /> what is right and fair and ethical and opt for Option 3 as staff recommends. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 26, 2015 Page 11 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.