Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 8, below, is a photograph of the barn and the "cut" into the existing slope with the <br /> approximate profile of the slope indicated by the red line. <br /> Figure 8: Existing Barn <br /> • <br /> • <br /> 991 <br /> die+ y+ . <br /> • <br /> • <br /> 7. <br /> - j <br /> Staff concluded from review of the slope map (Figure 6) that these areas of the Lund <br /> Ranch II property were originally natural slopes with grades less than 25 percent, and <br /> that the slopes over a 25-percent slope grade were likely the result of the grading done <br /> by the Lund family long before the approval of Measure PP. Staff considers these <br /> graded slopes to be artificial and not covered by Measure PP even though they exceed <br /> the 25-percent slope grade.4 <br /> The City Council may want to consider the following options: <br /> • Option One: <br /> If the City Council decides that artificial slopes over a 25-percent grade are <br /> excluded from Measure PP provided that they were graded before Measure PP <br /> and on slopes having a natural grade less than 25 percent, Lots 28 through 30 <br /> and 33 through 39 would then be retained in the development. The Planning <br /> Commission was supportive of this option. <br /> 4 With the development application of the Nana Japan site (southwest corner of Dublin Canyon Road and Foothill <br /> Road), the City determined that the slope bank along the Dublin Canyon Road and Foothill Road sides of the <br /> project site was a manufactured slope that resulted from the road widening and, therefore, was not subject to the <br /> requirements of Measure PP. <br /> Page 16 of 26 <br />