My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
111715
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 11:15:56 AM
Creation date
11/10/2015 4:02:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/17/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
intended use with all of its permits and approvals which maintains the existing plan and move forward <br /> with greater density, more square footage, higher water use, traffic and this is what they have chosen <br /> not to do to be a good neighbor. To reflect that the church is somehow profiting, he wanted to state for <br /> the record that they take exception to this kind of comment as they are in no way doing this. <br /> Lastly, Pastor Barris reminded the Council that PNI as it relates to churches, churches are allowed to <br /> occupy space in other zones. The property they are pursuing would enable them to move to a <br /> commercial/industrial location where two other churches are located and be able to continue their <br /> ministry. They are intending to be a good neighbor and thinks that the current plan best reflects the <br /> needs of the surrounding neighborhood and community at-large. <br /> Mayor Thorne closed the public hearing. <br /> BREAK <br /> The Council took a 10-minute break at 9:22 p.m. and thereafter reconvened the regular City Council <br /> meeting at 9:32 p.m. <br /> Mr. Beaudin referred to the memorandum and said it is written in two parts. The first was additional <br /> information so staff could have an apples-to-apples comparison for water and traffic impacts which is in <br /> response to public comments. They focused on the existing development on the site as well as the <br /> entitled project which is the 900 seat church and 200 student school use and the proposed application, <br /> using 25 units on 100 homes. This was to answer a question during the public comment period leading <br /> to this hearing. Staff added the weekend peak hour trip analysis to understand the implications of the <br /> church use relative to some other uses. They used a one-hour peak on a Sunday which is 11AM and <br /> this is evidenced both in the table and summarized in the memorandum. <br /> He said staff also in Part 1 touched on the land designated for community facilities and conducted an <br /> overview on the privately available, potentially developable land that is currently public and institutional. <br /> This equates to the pie chart in the presentation. <br /> The second part of the memorandum was a series of minor revisions and clarifications to the <br /> information that was included in the agenda reports. Both sections of this memo were included in Mr. <br /> Weinstein's presentation, but it was not combined together. The Council saw project conditions of <br /> approval that had to be revised, which were changes Mr. Weinstein referenced pertaining to the <br /> operation of the private school and deferring to the state regulations, as well as the one change to the <br /> Affordable Housing Agreement where 26 units was inadvertently added when it should be 25 units, as <br /> well as other minor changes to the conditions which are non-substantive but needed in the record for <br /> the hearing. Mr. Beaudin said he could answer any questions regarding the numbers or content of the <br /> memo. <br /> Councilmember Olson pointed out that for a number of weeks, knowing this project was coming up <br /> there has been uncertainty as to whether he needed to recuse himself based on the fact that he lives in <br /> the Village at Ironwood. He noted a letter was sent outlining the nature of the project, concerns, his <br /> residence location, and the FPPC opined yesterday that he did not have to recuse himself on the <br /> matter. <br /> Councilmember Olson said he thinks it is important that this area remain residential. The area around it <br /> is residential. The impact on traffic for those residences will be minimal. It is a small project and he <br /> thinks the church is to be congratulated on deciding to keep this to create the property as residential <br /> and requesting the change in zoning. The fact that the church is selling to a home builder rather than <br /> another church tells him that the highest and best use for this property is for residential and he did not <br /> think the church should be criticized for deciding to sell for a price that makes more sense to them. He <br /> takes the pastor's word that they are not making money on this deal. For the surrounding <br /> neighborhoods, it is best that it become residential. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 16 of 28 October 6,2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.