Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 3 <br /> Steve Otto <br /> From: Linda Garbarino <br /> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 3:43 PM <br /> To: Maria Hoey <br /> Subject: Historic Residential Preservation-Municipal Codes <br /> Hello Pleasanton City Council Members, <br /> As the council discusses historic preservation issues on November 3, the focus will be on which homes within <br /> our DSP that would benefit from Municipal Code language to protect their architectural integrity. I wanted to <br /> follow up with each of you regarding the concerns I've discussed with council about design review authority. <br /> There were over 200 homes that were surveyed as part of the limited scope Historic Survey process conducted <br /> by ARG. <br /> Of the 83 homes found to be historic within the DSP, the design review authority needs to be secured through a <br /> municipal code as recommended to you by the Planning Commission. <br /> There were 103 homes found not to qualify for historic status. These homes are within historic neighborhoods <br /> often in between those found to be historic. Unfortunately, they were altered enough that their original <br /> architectural integrity was lost. The concern is that they are not protected for first floor remodel. This is true for <br /> single as well as two-story homes. What that means is these homes can be remodeled again and again without <br /> planning oversight from the city. What we are asking is for you to direct your professional planning staff to <br /> develop language expanding design review authority for those 103 homes within the historic <br /> neighborhoods by developing municipal code language allowing the protection for the basic changes in a <br /> home: changes in windows, doors, siding and massing. <br /> In my thorough review of the historic survey document those changes in windows, doors, siding and massing <br /> were the major reasons that the 103 homes were disqualified. If design review authority had been in place for <br /> the first floor of homes in the DSP there would have been far more homes qualify as historic. Recall also that <br /> changes in first floor for single story homes, 10 feet or under, could be the entire home! <br /> Thanks for your consideration of these issues. The Historic Preservation Task Force recommended that the <br /> municipal code be developed for the first 10 feet of homes within the DSP. Noting that the positive impact of <br /> this would preserve the historic look of our city based on the styles we enjoy that are listed in the Historic <br /> Context Statement. Unmonitored changes in homes without design review may have some positive results <br /> because of the diligence of a few owners who made efforts to replicate historic looks to their homes. But the <br /> worrisome factor here is that there are examples of homes where serious errors in placement of windows, doors, <br /> siding and massing have compromised the community character and neighborhood preservation. Quality of life <br /> is important and the threat of incremental degradation of our historic neighborhoods will exist without design <br /> review protection. Rising tides lift all boats. Everyone wins when the property values are protected. <br /> Thanks to all of you for your consideration of these important issues regarding the preservation our city's <br /> residential architectural integrity. <br /> Linda Garbarino, Member <br /> Pleasanton Historic Preservation Task Force <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br /> t <br />