My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
110315
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2015 3:38:00 PM
Creation date
10/14/2015 3:54:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/3/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS 9-16
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
project; (b) certification of the Final EIR as complete and adequate; (c) the CEQA <br /> Findings and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and (d) Case PUD-25, <br /> the PUD Rezoning and Development Plan, as shown in Option 2, Require the <br /> project to be redesigned to access only to Sunset Creek Lane, as described on <br /> page 34 of the June 24, 2015 staff report, with the 24-foot road option without <br /> retaining walls, subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit A of the <br /> June 24, 2015 staff report, with the following modifications: <br /> • Modify Conditions of Approval Nos. 14, 55, and 105 and add two conditions <br /> as set forth in the staff memo dated June 24, 2015, with a modification to <br /> one of the new conditions to mandate the use of recycled water for all dust <br /> control; <br /> • Add a new condition regarding areas of man-made slope as presented by <br /> staff at the August 26, 2015 meeting; and <br /> • Add a new condition restricting the home on Lot 32 to be single story. <br /> Commissioner Ritter seconded the motion. <br /> Commissioner Piper stated that she does not know how to vote on this as she is very <br /> much in favor of Option 2; however, a road is not mentioned anywhere in the motion. <br /> Mr. Dolan clarified that Option 2 includes a Sunset Creek Lane connection. <br /> Commissioner Piper stated that she should then vote in opposition because she <br /> believes that a road is a structure, and therefore it would be a violation of Measure PP. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> AYES: Commissioners Allen, Balch, Nagler, and Ritter <br /> NOES: Commissioner Piper <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> RECUSED: Commissioners O'Connor <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> Resolution No. PC-2015-26 recommending approval of the Development Agreement to <br /> vest entitlements for the project; Resolution No. PC-2015-27 recommending certification <br /> of the Final EIR as complete and adequate, together with the CEQA Findings and the <br /> Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and Resolution No. PC-2015-28 <br /> recommending approval of Case PUD-25, the PUD Rezoning and Development Plan, <br /> were entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 26, 2015 Page 26 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.