Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 11 <br /> PUD-25, Greenbriar Homes Communities, Lund Ranch II <br /> Applications for (1) Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezoning and Development <br /> Plan approval to construct 50 single-family, two-story homes and related <br /> improvements on the approximately 194.7-acre Lund Ranch II property located at <br /> 1500 Lund Ranch Road at the end of Lund Ranch Road; (2) Certification of the <br /> Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the project; and <br /> (3) Development Agreement to vest entitlements for the project. Zoning for the <br /> property is PUD-LDR/OS (Planned Unit Development— Low Density <br /> Residential/Open Space) District. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor recused himself due to a conflict of interest. <br /> Brian Dolan presented the staff report, noting that this is a continued hearing from the <br /> June 24, 2015 Planning Commission meeting, where the four Commissioners present <br /> were unable to pass a motion, and the Commissioner's Handbook provides that when a <br /> motion results in a tie vote, the item would be re-heard at a future meeting with a full <br /> Commission in attendance. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that he would not be going through the long, comprehensive <br /> presentation made at the last meeting but would only be covering some new information <br /> specifically requested by the Commission at and since that meeting. He indicated that <br /> his presentation tonight would primarily be related to the impacts of potentially building a <br /> second access road up the hill to connect to Sunset Creek Lane, followed by a <br /> reiteration of staffs recommendation and the reason behind such recommendation, and <br /> ending with a few housekeeping items. <br /> Mr. Dolan then displayed slides of a series of sections of the possible roadway across <br /> the side of the hill that leads up to Sunset Creek Lane, indicating that there is a <br /> Summary Sheet at the end of these options which gives some information about the <br /> quantities of grading involved. <br /> 1. Option A is a 32-foot roadway with an eight-foot wide trail and shows the existing <br /> as well as the proposed grade. There would be a substantial amount of fill on the <br /> bottom side of this particular section of the roadway. Further along the road, the <br /> grading flips and ends up with grading above the road; and farther down the <br /> roadway, there is a cut above the roadway where the grading would occur. <br /> 2. Twenty-Four-Foot Wide Alternative is a narrower road. The standard roadway is <br /> 32 feet wide; and there is an opportunity here to narrow the roadway to 24 feet <br /> because there is really no need to provide parking on this street. The grading <br /> pattern would remain above in one location and below in the other, but the <br /> grading is not quite as extensive and would have a little bit less impact on the <br /> hills. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 26, 2015 Page 1 of 26 <br />