My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
110315
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2015 3:38:00 PM
Creation date
10/14/2015 3:54:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/3/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS 9-16
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 10 <br /> THE CITY OF -_ <br /> - <br /> pLEASANTONC <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> Date: August 26, 2015 <br /> To: Planning Commissioners <br /> From: Brian Dolan, Assistant City Manager <br /> Subject: Item 6. a., PUD-25, Greenbriar Homes, Lund Ranch II <br /> The subject application was heard by the Planning Commission on June 24, 2015. At <br /> that meeting (see Exhibit A for the Minutes Excerpt), the Commission had four members <br /> in attendance who were able to vote on the project. After extensive testimony from the <br /> community and a lengthy discussion among the Commissioners, the four <br /> Commissioners were unable to achieve majority support for any motion. Per the <br /> Commissioner's Handbook, the item was then rescheduled to a subsequent meeting at <br /> which a full Planning Commission would be available. <br /> At the July 22, 2015 meeting and in follow-up correspondence, the Commissioners <br /> expressed interest in additional information on: (1) the grading impacts of the potential <br /> road connection to Sunset Creek Lane; and (2) whether a connection to Sunset Creek <br /> Lane could be built without traversing a 25-percent slope. These topics are discussed <br /> below: <br /> 1. Grading impacts of potential road connections. The applicant has provided the <br /> attached information relative to the potential Sunset Creek connection (see <br /> Exhibit B). The attached information includes design data and plans for three <br /> options: (1) Option A, a 32-foot wide roadway and eight-foot wide trail with no <br /> retaining walls (except at the bottom of the hill where the road would need to <br /> cross the existing creek); (2) Option B, a 32-foot wide roadway and eight-foot <br /> wide trail with retaining walls; and (3) Option C, a narrower 24-foot wide roadway <br /> and eight-foot wide trail without retaining walls (except at the bottom of the hill). <br /> Two sections for Options A and B are provided, showing the locations of <br /> maximum cut and maximum fill for each Option. <br /> The summary comparison of the Options provides information on street length, <br /> area of street coverage and grading, amount of grading in areas over 25-percent <br /> slope (with truck-load equivalents), the number of heritage trees that would need <br /> to be removed, amount of cut-and-fill, maximum depth of cut-and-fill, and the <br /> length and size of walls required. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.